Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp-value = 0.00060.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Results are shown in Figure 2 , highlighting a mild but highly significant correlation with mast cells and erythroblasts ( R =0.25 and R =0.38, p-value = 0.0006 and 0.00000526, respectively), regardless of the hematological disease studied; on the contrary, no correlations were found with B- nor with T-cells.
extremely significantp = 0.00060.0× alphaqualified
At day 14, compared to untreated group the two-tailed p values of 46F2SIP and L19-IL2 groups were very significant ( p = 0.0041, p = 0.0047) and for 46F2SIP/L19-IL2 group were extremely significant ( p = 0.0006), indicating the strong efficacy of combined therapy.
marginally significantp = 6 × 10 −40.0× alphagold
Predicted “neutral” community classes included the third community class identified on alginate particles, which colonized these particles from time 0–12 h (empirical- p > 0.20); the first community class on chitosan (0–48 h, marginally significant; empirical- p = 6 × 10 −4 for the local model); and chitin was again an exception, with the first community class appearing neutral (defined along the whole trajectory, empirical- p > 0.8).
highly significantp = 0.00060.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Ordinary one‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test was performed to compare the amount of mGluR‐LTD in the four different conditions (control; roscovitine; LP‐211; LP‐211 + roscovitine, Figure 1c ), confirming a highly significant difference (*** p = 0.0006).
highly significantP = 0.00060.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The difference was highly significant for total species richness ( χ 2 = 11.921, P = 0.0006) and exclusive species richness ( χ 2 = 42.667, P = 0.0001) but was not significantly different for the richness of plant families ( χ 2 = 1.463, P = 0.2265, Figure 3 ).
nominally significantP = 0.00060.0× alphagold
5.8%; P = 0.90), momelotinib was associated with nominally significant improvements in the rates of total symptom score (TSS) reduction ≥ 50% (26.2% vs. 5.9%; nominal P = 0.0006) and RBC transfusion independence at week 24 (43.3% vs. 21.2%; nominal P = 0.0012) [ 9 ].
highly significantp=0.00060.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The first primary outcome variable tested, the difference between groups in TBUT, was in fact, highly significant (p=0.0006), and it is worth noting that the difference between groups for the second primary outcome, OSDI, did not approach statistical significance (p=0.9843).