Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,635 sentences

highly significantp = 5.89 –180.0× alphaqualifiedgold
[ANOVA revealed highly significant among treatment groups for H2O2 F(9, 20) = 217.64, p = 5.89 –18 ; ANOVA for NO 2 - F(9, 20) = 91.06, p = 2.98 –14 ; ANOVA for NO 3 - F(9, 20) = 166.13, p = 8.41917 –17 ; Tukey’s post hoc comparisons are reported in Supplementary Table S4].
highly significantP =6.9 × 10 −180.0× alphaqualifiedgold
16p13.3 has a cis -effect on MLST8 and possibly PGP Our cis -expression QTL study shows that rs30986 has a highly significant positive correlation with the expression levels of MLST8 in at least 9 brain regions (meta-analysis P =6.9 × 10 −18 , Fig. 2b , Supplementary Fig. 7b ) including the cerebellum (meta-analysis P =4.9 × 10 −5 , see Fig. 2b and Supplementary Table 4 ), temporal cortex, hippocampus and substantia nigra.
highly significantp -value ≈ 10 −170.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Because the persistence-length data did not satisfy normality (Shapiro–Wilk p = 0.002), differences between force fields were assessed using a Wilcoxon rank-sum test, which showed a highly significant effect of force field ( p -value ≈ 10 −17 ), whereas no significant differences were detected across chain lengths, suggesting that the persistence length is largely independent of chain length over the range considered.
highly significantp < 1 × 10 −170.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Spearman’s correlation analysis (Supplementary Table 5 ) revealed moderate (−0.476 and −0.610) but very highly significant ( p < 1 × 10 −17 ) associations between the level of locomotor activity and two conditions (18 °C and DD, respectively).
highly significantp < 10 −170.0× alphaqualifiedgold
We found highly significant evidence of positive selection acting on Avian GSTA2 ( p < 10 −17 ; M8 PAML, Supplementary Table 9 ) and identified with high statistical confidence (posterior probabilities >0.99) several GSTA2 sites targeted by this acceleration in evolutionary rates ( d N / d S = 3.50; Fig. 4a ).
highly significantp = 1.2 × 10 −170.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Blood glucose concentrations at each time were subjected to RMANOVA examining for the main effects of time and treatment and the time × treatment interaction; after demonstrating a highly significant time × treatment interaction ( p = 1.2 × 10 −17 ), blood glucose concentrations at each time were subjected to RMANOVA followed by Tukey’s test, as described above for AUC.