Barely Significant
← all phrases

a borderline significant trend

65 sentences · 65 papers · 296 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a borderline significant trendp = 0.0661.3× alphagold
Associations between Dietary Iron and Risk on Elevated Fasting Glucose Stratified by the rs10830963 Risk Allele in the MTNR1B Gene After adjusting for age, sex, region, years of education, physical activity level, intentional physical exercise, smoking status, alcohol use, and total energy, a borderline significant trend was observed across the quartiles of total dietary iron and risk of elevated fasting glucose among G allele non-carriers ( p = 0.066), while a linear trend was found among G allele carriers ( p = 0.033) in all participants ( Table 3 and Figure 2 ).
a borderline significant trendp = 0.0701.4× alphagold
In the fully adjusted model (Model 4), which included demographics, lifestyle factors, and comorbidities, significant inverse association remained evident in the combined analysis (Q2: HR 0.841, 95% CI: 0.741–0.954, p = 0.007; Q3: HR 0.817, 95% CI: 0.686–0.972, p = 0.023), with a borderline significant trend for Q4 (HR 0.800, 95% CI: 0.629–1.018, p = 0.070).
a borderline significant trendp = 0.0921.8× alphagold
The lateral extension 14 of the PFNA blade compared with that in the image taken immediately after surgery showed a borderline significant trend (Group A, 3.3 ± 1.3 mm (min, 0.5; max, 5.1) and Group B, 5.1 ± 2.1 mm (min, 1.5; max, 8.4); p = 0.092) at 3 months and statistically significant difference at 24 months after surgery (Group A, 3.6 ± 3.1 mm (min, 0.5; max, 7.8); Group B 7.8 ± 3.7 mm (min, 3.0; max, 12.5); p = 0.017).
The discrepancy between the results of these two systematic reviews is likely a consequence of broader inclusion criteria as Zeiler and colleagues included pediatric studies [ 117 , 118 ], one study that demonstrated a borderline significant trend between CSF-IL-1β and outcome [ 119 ], as well as one study predominantly describing increased CSF levels of IL-1β without a clear relationship to outcome [ 120 ].
For admission with heart failure, group 2 was associated with a lower risk than group 1; however, group 3 did not show a significant difference compared to group 1, while group 4 showed only a borderline significant trend toward a lower risk of admission for heart failure compared to group 1.