“a borderline significant trend”

Node count showed a borderline significant trend (−2.59/μm, p = 0.051), while BD was unaffected (−0.0026 mm − 2 /μm, p = 0.498).

There was a borderline significant trend for a higher percentage of content drawn by a child at time 2 ( M = 87.40%) relative to time 1 ( M = 79.23%; p = .051).

There was a borderline significant trend for microgametes to accumulate at an interface with “females” and be repelled from an interface of “control” cues (Fig. 5 ; χ 1,5 2 = 3.83, P = 0.051).

ILCs harboring ERBB2 mutations also showed a borderline significant trend towards a higher median post-pET Ki67 index ( P = 0.0513) (Supplementary Fig. 7 ).

Implant users showed a similar but attenuated gradient with a borderline significant trend ( p = 0.052).

A borderline significant trend was shown between iTu-TILs and invasion depth (p=0.052). str-TIL density was significantly related with depth of invasion (p<0.001) and showed borderline association with lymph node involvement (p=0.053) and TNM stage (p=0.054).

10 No difference in mortality was found between groups, though there was a borderline significant trend towards fewer heart failure hospitalizations in those who received a CRT-defibrillator (hazard ratio [HR] 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.38–1.01; P = .052).

There were no significant between group differences in total distance at any displacement, but the Avoider vs Non‐Avoider group comparison at day 5 showed a borderline significant trend ( p = 0.0526) (Figure S6C ).

A borderline significant trend was found only for processed meat and colorectal cancer mortality ( p = 0.053) [ 38 ].

Response inhibition performance was not significantly different between task versions [combined n -back/nogo: 87.44%, single go/nogo: 83.02%, t (24) = 1.76, p = 0.091, d = 0.44] Further, we found a borderline significant trend toward a reduced number of omission errors in the combined n -back/nogo task compared to the single n -back task [ t (24) = −2.04, p = 0.053, d = 0.43].

Interestingly, we found a borderline significant trend ( p = 0.053) in the MRD-negative group, where patients with a higher MaxΔVAF (suggesting a larger drop from a potentially higher preoperative VAF) paradoxically showed a trend towards worse DFS (Fig. 3 A).

In the pellet consumption tests, BACHD rats now needed a similar amount of time to consume the reward pellets, although there was a borderline significant trend towards BACHD rats needing more time (p = 0.0535).

We found a borderline significant trend towards an association between the 8-oxodG pre-post intervention change and categorical response status (F(2,73) = 2.91, p = 0.054), with all remitters showing a reduction in 8-oxodG excretion as compared to the non-responders and intermediate responders.

Only IgG titers against SURFIN 4.2 were on a borderline significant trend (p = 0.054) as predictor of the ability to reduce rosetting.

Interestingly, while the C allele showed a borderline significant trend toward CAD risk in both males (OR=4.90, p=0.054) and females (OR=2.99, p=0.077), analyzing the combined total allele pool revealed a highly significant, independent 3.5-fold increase in CAD susceptibility (OR=3.56, p=0.009).

86Y frequency declined markedly after ACT policy introduction, with a borderline significant trend for a more rapid decline in countries with AL policies (p=0.055).

A borderline significant trend towards more atopic eczema in children suffering from recurrent wheezing was observed (32% vs. 16%, p = 0.055).

The areca nut chewing history showed a borderline significant trend (P = 0.055, odds ratio = 1.370, 95% confidence interval: 0.993–1.890).

Aluminum foil and utensil usage were minimal, with most participants never using them, although aluminum foil showed a borderline significant trend (χ2 = 16.62, P < 0.055).

There was a borderline significant trend for improved survival over time ( P =0.055).

In contrast, BMI showed only a borderline significant trend (MD = -0.31 kg/m 2 , P = 0.055), and the differences between groups in hip circumference and muscle mass were not statistically significant.

Additionally, although the unadjusted log‐rank analysis demonstrated significantly improved AF‐free survival ( p = 0.039), multivariable Cox regression showed only a borderline significant trend (adjusted HR 0.491, 95% CI 0.237–1.016, p = 0.055), further reflecting the limited power for adjusted analysis.

This correlation lost its statistical significance in the group with diabetes, likely due to the reduction in sample size associated with stratification, although a borderline significant trend was observed (r = 0.54, p = 0.056; Supplementary Table S3 ).

In addition to the significant association to OR and tumor stage at week 0 in this restricted set, patient clustering showed a borderline significant trend toward association to proliferation ( P = 0.057) and the clustering pattern changed similarly from week 0 to week 25.

Although the mean changes of plasma TG levels in phase II had a borderline significant trend between the P-E group (−6.30 ± 60.31) and the E-P group (−25.74 ± 55.18) in ITT analysis ( P = 0.057).