carboplatin–etoposide) showed a numerical trend favoring cisplatin–etoposide (13.1 vs. 7.1 months, p = 0.182).
← all phrases
“a numerical trend”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
31 There was also a numerical trend toward a reduced incidence of TLR with DCB (3.4% vs 10.3%; P = .20), but the difference was not statistically significant owing to the limited statistical power. 31 More recently, in the BASKET-SMALL 2 (Basel Kosten Effektivitäts Trial-DCBs versus Drug-eluting Stents in Small Vessel Interventions 2
There was a numerical trend toward lower DC values during the tilt phase, with a median of 4.58 (1.58; 7.56) ms ( p =0.212) for the entire cohort ( Table 5 ).
Subgroup analysis showed a numerical trend toward longer median PFS in patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 1 compared with CPS < 1 (14.0 vs. 12.8 months; P = 0.235).
Similar to the results of the overall cohort, the allogeneic HCT subgroup demonstrated no difference in composite bleeding events or VTE events between the pre-VPP and post-VPP groups, though there was a numerical trend towards more bleeding events (18 (21.4%) vs. 24 (27.3%), p = 0.37) and less VTE events in the post-VPP group (8 (9.5%) vs. 4 (4.5%), p = 0.24) (Tables S 1 , S 2 ).
PAC use was not significantly associated with survival in this study, despite a numerical trend toward better outcome (p=0.400, Table 5 , Figure S4 ).
In keeping with this, a numerical trend was evident for the higher Killip class in the NR group; however, this did not reach statistical importance (p = 0.502).
In the analysis which accounted for all these four prognostic factors, there was a numerical trend in favor of rIX-FP compared to rFIXFc for total ABR (RR 0.75; 95% CI 0.32, 1.75; P = 0.5095) and AjBR (RR 0.82; 95% CI 0.37, 1.82; P = 0.6178), and AsBR (RR 0.42; 95% CI 0.22, 0.82; P = 0.0107) was significantly lower in subjects treated with rIX-FP versus rFIXFc (Table 3 ).
While there was a numerical trend towards OS benefit with olaparib (median OS 19.3 months versus 17.1 months), this was not statistically significant (HR 0.90; 95% CI 0.66–1.23; p = 0.513) [ 6 ].
2C ), but a numerical trend was observed in the PD-L1 ≥50% subgroup (Kruskal–Wallis P value = 0.52).
However, despite a numerical trend whereby the older cows produced a greater number of vocalizations, no significant differences between parity orders were detected ( p = 0.580; SEM = 17.86; Figure 7 b). 4.
Again, in patients with TNBC, there was a numerical trend towards a possible association between DTC-persistence and decreased pCR rate (25.0% vs. 50.0%; 25% difference in pCR; p = 0.585, Fig. 4 ).
Furthermore, we observed a numerical trend towards lower response rates and objective response rates in the CPS high group compared to the CPS low group ( P =0.64, Fisher exact test, Figure S6 A ; P =0.48, Fisher exact test, Figure S6 B ).
They did not meet their primary objective of PFS improvement in pretreated HR + /HER2− ABC over ET of physician’s choice 42 , 43 , although a numerical trend suggested greater benefit in the presence of ESR1 mutations.
Unadjusted DHA in our analysis was not statistically significant with regard to an impact on MACE, although a numerical trend was noted toward lower events in those in Q4.
A numerical trend could also be observed amongst lymphocytes cultured with unactivated HUVECs, though this difference was not statistically significant.
While the exploratory analyses were not statistically significant, there was a numerical trend for an impact of ONCOS-102 on survival in chemotherapy-naïve patients (n=17): 30-month OS rate was 34.1% vs 0%, median OS was 20.3 vs 13.5 months ( figure 3C ), and median PFS: 8.9 vs 7.6 months ( figure 3D ) in the ONCOS-102 versus chemotherapy-alone cohorts.
After 12 weeks of treatment in the DANISH study, the biomarker levels showed a numerical trend to be lower or equal in BASDAI50 responders vs non-responders, in patients with ASDAS ≥ CII, ASDAS CII, or ASDAS MI vs ASDAS NI, respectively.
After achieving an initial clinical response, similar proportions of patients randomized to either therapy maintained their week 26 CDAI and DAS28(CRP) responses during 6-month follow-up, with a numerical trend favouring initial upadacitinib treatment across most disease activity measures ( Fig. 6 ).
Nonetheless, there is a numerical trend broadly in line with what we found in Experiment 1: ORCs had higher RTs than SRCs. 4.5.
There was a numerical trend for the enrichment of responses in models with low tATM H scores by IHC for AZD6738 monotherapy (38% low vs. 0% high) but no differential for a combination where high tATM models showed >50% TGI responses (63% low vs. 67% high) but with the caveat of a low number of models.
The only remarkable finding of these RT-qPCR results is that Prmt4/Carm1 loss reduces expression of Runx2 mRNA (at day 6, p < 0.001), with a numerical trend of decreased expression for Runx2 , Osterix/Sp7 and Dlx5 during the differentiation time-course (Fig.
There was a numerical trend toward fewer pest mites in the mass release compared with the control in this orchard ( Table S4 ).
Although LVMI was not statistically significant, there was a numerical trend, which is consistent with the results of unmatched analysis ( Supplementary Table S5 ).
21 , 24 Although there was a numerical trend in PFS favoring ibrutinib + CIT, the study was not adequately powered to allow for a formal statistical comparison, given the small number of patients with MZL.