Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a numerical trend”

1,013 sentences · 1,013 papers · 1,817 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

In our larger mild dementia cohort, we did not detect a benefit of tDCS on K-MMSE–defined global cognition, but we did observe a small, statistically significant advantage in confrontation naming (K-BNT) favoring active tDCS and a numerical trend toward greater change on the RCFT in the active arm.
Second, a numerical trend toward a higher prevalence of asymptomatic grade 1 pneumonitis at diagnosis was observed in patients with lung cancer than in those with non-lung cancers (61.9% vs 50.0%), possibly reflecting surveillance intensity variations rather than biological differences, as individuals with lung cancer typically undergo more frequent chest CT imaging for tumor response assessment.
In female patients assigned to mGPS category 1 or 2, a numerical trend towards longer OS was also observed in Arm A compared to Arm B, however, with statistical testing not revealing a significant survival difference between treatment arms (24.6 versus 16.7 months; P = 0.15) ( Supplementary Table S1 , available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103374 , Figure 4 A and B).
For MIBS-4, a numerical trend was observed (minor overlap in CI) suggesting, that on average, those suffering from milder symptoms between migraines (MIBS-4 score less than or equal to 4) placed more importance on “method of delivery” (mean 3.54, CI 3.40–3.68) than those with a score greater than or equal to 5 (mean 3.29, CI 3.17–3.41).
The amplitude pattern for the early effect resembled that found in our previous fMRI study, in that it was found for both familiar and unfamiliar faces, though there was a significant modulation by view (with greater deflections for same than different views, at least for familiar faces), which was only a numerical trend in our fMRI data.
15 Final OS results show a numerical trend favoring ipatasertib–paclitaxel (median OS 23.1 vs 18.4 months in ipatasertib vs placebo arm, stratified HR 0.62 [95% CI, 0.37-1.05]). 33 However, the Phase III IPATunity130 cohort A failed to show PFS benefit from the addition of ipatasertib to paclitaxel in patients with mTNBC harboring PIK3CA/AK
This effect could not be attributed to specific differences between single blocks by post-hoc tests, though there seemed to be a numerical trend for participants making slightly more errors in the middle of the experiment (lowest mean error rate: Block 1 = 5.7%, highest mean error rate: Block 3 = 7.7%, Block 6 = 6.8%).