Barely Significant
← all phrases

a numerical trend

724 sentences · 724 papers · 1,651 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

Although there was a numerical trend towards larger singleton presence costs (an index of attention capture by the color singleton distractor) in the first halves of the blocks (10 ms) than the second halves of the blocks (−6 ms), F (1, 69) = 3.25, p = .08, η p 2 = .05 (see Fig. 2 B), this effect was only a small fraction of the effect reported in Vatterott and Vecera’s ( 2012 ) Experiment 1 (approximately 77 ms vs. −29 ms for the first and second halves, respectively, as estimated from their Fig. 2 ).
Learned distractor rejection: Robust but surprisingly rapid.
Atten Percept Psychophys · 2025 · PMC12058820
Second, a numerical trend toward a higher prevalence of asymptomatic grade 1 pneumonitis at diagnosis was observed in patients with lung cancer than in those with non-lung cancers (61.9% vs 50.0%), possibly reflecting surveillance intensity variations rather than biological differences, as individuals with lung cancer typically undergo more frequent chest CT imaging for tumor response assessment.
Multivariate logistic analyses, restricted to FOLFOX-4-treated patients (as only they were exposed to a pump), showed that pump malfunction was associated with an increased risk of grade 3/4 neutropenia (OR 1.57, 97.5% CI: 1.03–2.38; P =0.00165) and a numerical trend for increased risk of grade 3/4 adverse events of special interest for fluoropyrimidines such as neutropenia and gastrointestinal effects (OR 1.25, 97.5% CI: 0.82–1.92; P =0.2361).
15 Final OS results show a numerical trend favoring ipatasertib–paclitaxel (median OS 23.1 vs 18.4 months in ipatasertib vs placebo arm, stratified HR 0.62 [95% CI, 0.37-1.05]). 33 However, the Phase III IPATunity130 cohort A failed to show PFS benefit from the addition of ipatasertib to paclitaxel in patients with mTNBC harboring PIK3CA/AK
Tenecteplase showed a numerical trend toward benefit (OR 1.33; 95% CrI 0.98–1.78) but did not reach statistical significance.
ePoster.
Eur J Neurol · 2026 · PMC13310587
Furthermore, within lysis time Q4 (2940 to 11 302 s), there was a numerical trend towards higher rates of cardiovascular events with increasing lysis time on adjusted analysis ( Figure 3 ) that was consistent with previous findings in ACS patients and warrants future scrutiny of those with very high lysis times.