Barely Significant
← all phrases

a positive trend

5,551 sentences · 5,551 papers · 20,246 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a positive trendp = 0.0761.5× alphagold
1,8-cineole exhibited a significant negative correlation with IC50 ( r = −0.639, p = 0.047) and a positive trend with FRAP ( r = 0.584, p = 0.076), indicating enhanced antioxidant efficacy in high-content ecotypes (e.g., TP5: 19.28%, IC50 2.80 μg/mL, FRAP 549.875 μM Fe 2+ /g; TP9: 20%, IC50 2.86 μg/mL, FRAP 548.156 μM Fe 2+ /g).
a positive trendp = 0.0761.5× alphagold
Although the difference was not statistically significant, a positive trend toward event-free survival was observed for the patients with better baseline peak VO 2 in Kaplan–Meier analysis [ p = 0.076, HR 0.384 (95% Confidence interval (CI):0.128–1.151), p = 0.088], as illustrated in Figure A1 .
a positive trendp = 0.0771.5× alphagold
However, in exploratory unadjusted analyses, HLA-B53 showed higher odds of neurological involvement when compared with children without neurological disease and healthy controls (OR = 6.29; 95% CI: 1.23–32.13; nominal p = 0.027), while HLA-B45 demonstrated a positive trend (OR = 3.75; 95% CI: 0.87–16.22; nominal p = 0.077).
a positive trendp = 0.0781.6× alphagold
Interestingly, age was not a significant measure predictive of awareness level, but a positive trend emerged where women in the age groups 45–65 were the most aware of EC symptoms among the sample population ( p = 0.078). 30% of the women in these age groups were defined as having an awareness level greater than or equal to one.
a positive trendp = 0.0781.6× alphagold
Relationship self-report craving and skin conductance level during the cue-reactivity paradigm In the smoker cohort, a positive trend was observed between the self-reported craving score and the skin conductance level ( R = 0.18, p = 0.078 ), although it did not reach statistical significance.
a positive trendp value = 0.07891.6× alphagold
We analysed the correlation between the time during which they had been taking ocrelizumab and until they received their second dose of vaccine and the associated T cell response (Ag1 and Ag2) and did not find any significant differences, but there was a positive trend for the t correlation: R 2 = 0.8484, p value = 0.0789 for Ag1 and R 2 = 0.7875, p value = 0.1126 for Ag2.