“a trend toward significance”

Those proteins that had both a trend toward significance ( p < 0.1) and a log 2 fold change > ±0.5 detected in the mutant compared to WT-overexpressing cells are shown in Figure S3 .

A trend toward significance (0.05 < p < 0.1) was observed for pulmonary superinfection and SARS-CoV-2 IgG seropositivity at hospital admission.

All significant variables (p < 0.05) and those with a trend toward significance (p < 0.10) were entered into the regression model using the forward conditional method.

Significance was considered at the level of p < 0.05 (0.05 < p < 0.10 was considered a trend toward significance).

The rates of clinical remission for the 1,800- and 1,200-mg doses were not significantly greater than placebo, although there was a trend toward significance for the 1,800-mg dose, P =0.1011.

Frequency of mental health care use We observed effect measure modification by race for K6 distress categories ( p = 0.043) and showed a trend toward significance for sex ( p = 0.103; Figure 4B ).

A trend toward significance was observed in other cardiovascular diseases: hypertension (68% FECD and 50% controls, P = 0.103), congestive heart failure (12% FECD and 2% controls, P = 0.112), and coronary artery disease (20% FECD and 8% controls, P = 0.148).

rs261316 showed a trend toward significance in the INVEST white–Hispanic meta‐analysis (OR: 1.22, 95% CI, 0.94–1.59, P =0.104), with the association driven by INVEST Hispanics only (OR: 1.56, 95% CI, 1.05–2.32, P =0.030).

Pairwise comparisons revealed a significant difference between both focus condition for the central test stimulus, t (28) = 2.31, p = .014, and a trend toward significance for the central standard stimulus t (28) = 1.29, p = .104 (one-tailed).

Furthermore, PSA density > 0.20 ng/mL 2 showed a trend toward significance (OR = 1.73, 95% CI: 0.89–3.36, p = 0.106), as did D’Amico intermediate/high-risk classification (OR = 1.89, 95% CI: 0.97–3.68, p = 0.061).

There was a trend toward significance in the metabolic value in the VOIs centered at the right lentiform nuclei in the HIE group compared with the HC group ( p = 0.106). 3.2.

No significant main effect of day was found in most groups: PQ/WS-ASH: F (2, 33) = 0.37, p = 0.697, η 2 = 0.022 PQ/Tonic: F (2, 33) = 1.03, p = 0.368, η 2 = 0.059 PQ/Ubisol-Q10: F (2, 33) = 1.75, p = 0.190, η 2 = 0.096 saline/water: F (2, 33) = 1.46, p = 0.247, η 2 = 0.081 However, a trend toward significance was observed in the PQ/PTS group ( F (2, 33) = 2.40, p = 0.106, η 2 = 0.127).

393), with the corresponding p value indicating a trend toward significance ( p = 0.106).

Psychiatric symptoms (BPRS) also showed a trend toward significance ( p = 0.1061), while impulsivity (BIS-11), age, and education were not significant predictors ( p > 0.30 for all).

However, one of the change values in SOD showed a trend toward significance with the LIPC intervention ( P = 0.107).

Although only the left anterior subregion and the right body subregion reached statistical significance in volume loss, it is relevant to note that both the left body and right anterior subregions showed a trend toward significance ( p = 0.108 and p = 0.184, respectively), whereas the posterior subregions in both the left and right hippocampus were far from it ( p = 0.667 and p = 0.875, respectively).

Indeed, the bootstrapped unstandardized indirect effect (i.e., the effect of TW-Lambda on 30-day mortality going through the considered mediators) was tested to be significant only when considering LVEF as a mediator (estimate 0.235 95% CI 0.113, 0.350, <0.001), though a trend toward significance was also found when considering PVF as the mediator (estimate 0.063, 95% CI −0.013, 0.140, p = 0.108). 4.

Significant differences were reported between diets for vitamin E and Q10 ( Table 6 ), while for cholesterol, only a trend toward significance was observed ( p = 0.109).

60:40 CM ( p = 0.0105; Figure 2 D) and a trend toward significance for the natural Control 20:80 GM vs. 20:80 CM ( p = 0.109; Figure 2 E).

While it was difficult to obtain long-term follow-up data due to differences in documentation and incomplete patient charts (especially those from the early 2000s and prior), we did find a trend toward significance in the difference in patient disposition (p < 0.11).

Furthermore, when controlling for metastasis at the time of diagnosis, clustering using the 22-miRNA profile (reduced to 18 miRNAs due to mapping attrition) showed a trend toward significance (median RFS 8 vs 27 months, and 64 vs 105 months for metastatic and non-metastatic subgroups, respectively, stratified log rank p = 0.11).

Although no statistically significant difference or trend was observed when comparing mice exposed to 30 μg as a single dose with those exposed three times to 10 μg, a trend toward significance was seen when comparing this latter group with controls (p = 0.11).

A trend toward significance was noted when comparing overall body mass index in men versus women: 42.4% of men were obese versus 26.3% of women ( P =0.11).

When all monkeys were combined, however (n = 10), there was a trend toward significance in the relationship between EC 50 values and ethanol choice (r 2 = 0.29, p = 0.11).

Persistent pain after breast cancer treatment was found to be lower in the IORT group (25%) when compared to the breast EBRT group (34%), with a trend toward significance ( P = 0.11) [ 54 ].