“approached significance”

Notably, daily movement distances in 2022 were substantially reduced relative to 2015 (β = –1890 ± 772 m, p = 0.015), with a similar trend observed in 2019 that approached significance ( p = 0.052).

The difference at three months approached significance but did not reach the conventional threshold (p = 0.052).

The interaction between the two factors approached significance, F(1.200) = 3.817, p = 0.052, with a small effect size (η 2 p = 0.019; Cohen’s f = 0.14).

3.6 Mineral Associated Molecular Composition We found that MAOM molecular compound chemistry was primarily separated by depth and by its interaction with land use (Figure 4a ; p = 0.001), while land use approached significance ( p = 0.052).

Changes in head circumference also approached significance between the two groups ( P = 0.052), with the intervention group exhibiting better outcomes, similar to the other two indices.

People who received a new diagnosis of T2D reported higher levels of loneliness compared to healthy comparisons in unadjusted analyses, though the observed group difference only approached significance ( p = .052) when taking age, sex, and wealth into account.

A similar pattern emerged as in the total score: efficacy showed a significant positive effect ( B = 0.022, β = 0.298, p = 0.038; sr 2 = 0.085), and resilience approached significance ( p = 0.052; sr 2 = 0.075).

The indirect effect of progressive beliefs on child math achievement via authoritative parenting also approached significance ( β = 0.03, p = 0.052, 95% CI = [0.00, 0.07]).

However, the cardiac efficiency (CE) approached significance (sham vs. hiPS-CM: 2130 ± 556 vs. 4692 ± 2115 mmHg·mL/m 2 ; P = 0.052; Fig. 3 d), suggesting a difference in correlation.

Male sex also approached significance in the correlation with RDV therapy ( p = 0.052).

Although the right-side change was statistically significant (unadjusted p = 0.026), it only approached significance after correction for multiple comparison (adjusted p = 0.052).

Although marital status approached significance for moral courage ( p = 0.052), no other differences were significant across marital status or education level.

Adding the five serum components in Model 2 increased total explained variance to 46.5% (R2=0.465, adjusted R2=0.278) and the overall model approached significance (F (7,20) = 2.49, p = 0.052), but the change in R2 was not significant (ΔR2=0.150, F‐change (5,20) = 1.13, p = 0.379).

The difference in PSS-10 scores approached significance (U = 5628.50, Z = −1.95, p = 0.052), with lower scores observed in supplement users.

Group‐by‐sex interaction effects approached significance for parietal WMH volume (p = 0.052), suggesting an overall sex‐dependent effect of training.

Among patients with SNs, the difference between the five‐year RFS of the cT1c and cT1a‐b subgroups approached significance (69.0% vs. 72.5%, p = 0.052) (Figure 2B ).

However, the difference for FCR between treatments closely approached significance ( P = 0.052), where Liberty and Buster exhibited numerically more efficient feed conversion than Cracka by 3.43 % (1.407 versus 1.457).

Of the 35 cases with double dehiscence, 5 had extensive pneumatisation, and 4 of them were men; this association approached significance (Fisher's exact test p = 0.052, p = 0.052).

With respect to praise, only one of the eight outcomes approached significance: SRS-2 Total T -Score, t (22) = 2.06, p = 0.052, d = 0.89.

There was also a significant retention interval x misinformation interaction, Wald χ 2 (1, N = 46) = 9.74, p = 0.002, and a picture emotion x retention interval x misinformation interaction that approached significance (see Figure 3 ), Wald χ 2 (1, N = 46) = 5.92, p = 0.052.

Similarly, the rs2227307 variant in the CXCL8 gene showed no statistically significant difference; however, the comparison between the arthralgia group and controls approached significance ( p = 0.052). 3.3.

When controlling for gender, the effect of self-efficacy messages on melanoma-related self-efficacy approached significance ( P = .052), and women reported greater confidence that they could check their skin successfully than men on this scale of 1–5 (mean = 3.6, 95% CI = 3.5–3.7 vs 3.4, 95% CI = 3.3–3.5; P = .03, η p 2 = 0.01).

Additionally, the results revealed that the QSS score was a significant predictor ( β = 0.41, SE = 0.16, z = 2.66, p = .008), while the interaction with the landmark visualization condition approached significance ( β = −0.28, SE = 0.14, z = −1.94, p = .052) for the reconstruction of the landmarks sequence.

On the other hand, for the higher SRT group, the regression equation for word list recognition approached significance, F(4, 5) = 4.632, p = 0.052, accounting for 78.7% of the variance (R 2 = 0.787), with a positive correlation for neural tracking at SRS 25% and a negative correlation for neural tracking at SRS 75% as significant predictors ( p < 0.05). 4.

Age approached significance (χ 2 = 9.39, p = 0.052), while employment sector (χ 2 = 2.59, p = 0.629) and profession (χ 2 = 2.27, p = 0.517) showed no significant univariate associations.