Barely Significant
← all phrases

borderline significance

4,353 sentences · 4,353 papers · 11,068 search hits before verification

In the literature

borderline significancep = 0.0531.1× alpha
Furthermore, while the application of survey weights is essential for producing unbiased population estimates, it may reduce statistical power, as reflected in the borderline significance of Physical Health ( p = 0.053).
borderline significanceP = 0.0531.1× alpha
However, linear regression fit using only this subset of selected biomarkers confirmed a significant predictive value for the 2d‐S100B ( P = 0.009), 2d‐HMGB1 ( P = 0.026), (7d‐2d)‐HBGB1 ( P = 0.001), and (7d‐2d)‐TNF ( P = 0.02), whereas 2d‐TNF had borderline significance ( P = 0.053) and (7d‐2d)‐GFAP was not significant ( P = 0.185).
borderline significancep = 0.0531.1× alpha
Regarding CD, HLA‐A*03:01 and A*24:02 reached a borderline significance in negatively affecting the CD of individuals with acute COVID‐19 infection compared to those with sp status ( p = 0.053 and p = 0.06, respectively), while carriers of A*11:01 had significantly decreased CD compared to sp individuals.
borderline significancep = 0.0531.1× alpha
However, confining the analysis to the two infected groups to ascertain whether repeated administration was more effective than a single dose treatment gave only a borderline significance (treatment*time interaction, F 2.4, 19.3 = 3.21, p = 0.053) and there was no significant difference between the single dose treatment and the control group (post-hoc test, treatment*time interaction, F 1,8 , = 1.26, p = 0.3).
borderline significanceP = 0.0531.1× alpha
Although the association between gallstones and recurrence risk only showed borderline significance ( P = 0.053), the higher proportion of gallstones in the recurrence group suggests that, as a chronic stimulant, gallstones might be potentially linked to the long-term progression and postoperative recurrence risk of GBC through pathophysiological mechanisms such as inducing persistent inflammation and promoting abnormal cell proliferation [ 43 – 45 ].
borderline significancep = 0.0531.1× alpha
025 in the high expression group compared to the low expression group with 95% CI [0.756, 1.390], which is not statistically significant with p = 0.873; the HR for MMP9 in renal cell carcinoma is 1.365 in the high expression group compared to the low expression group with 95% CI [0.996, 1.870] with borderline significance p = 0.053.