“borderline significant”

There were no significant associations between neighborhood racial and ethnic composition and presence of unhealthy branded advertisements, but with each 10% higher neighborhood composition of Hispanic residents, there was a borderline significant higher presence of unhealthy branded advertisements (OR = 1.23; 95%CI: 1.00–1.51; P = 0.05).

In the group of exclusive cigarette smokers, this result was only borderline significant (p = 0.05), likely due to small numbers (data not shown).

However, the test was borderline significant ( p = .05) for the second moderation test in simple working memory.

Regarding vascular function markers, FMD (borderline significant p = 0.050), RI, AI, and SI were independently associated with a HR below 53 bpm.

Post hoc analysis was thus undertaken in those with limiting angina (n = 1507; 13.8%) 47 which reported ivabradine to be associated with a borderline significant 24% reduction in the primary endpoint (hazard ratio, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.58–1.00]; P = 0.05) and a 42% reduction in hospitalization for MI (hazard ratio, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.37–0.92]).

Gender had no significant interaction with any adverse event except for UTI, where it had a borderline significant interaction (p = 0.05).

For instance, the negative and borderline significant path from COMP to PU (β = -0.14, p = 0.050) challenges conventional TAM/TOE expectations.

Specifically, we observed a statistically significant 25% decrease in claudin-2, a 20% decrease in claudin-3, and a borderline significant ( p < 0.05, one-tailed Student’s t-test) 35% decrease in claudin-5 because of quercetin treatment.

Our next analysis suggested that metronidazole treatment in CDI is significantly associated with a lower recurrence rate ( p = 0.001), while it also showed a trend toward improved outcomes and reduced mortality, although these associations were borderline significant ( p = 0.050).

Comparison of birefringence values between diabetic subjects with no clinically manifest DR versus mild to moderate DR stages revealed a borderline significant difference (0.0065 [–0.000004; 0.0130], P = 0.050; Fig. 2 ).

The difference in mean triglyceride level in the placebo group was not significant after the intervention, although there was a borderline significant difference in the intervention group (p=0.05); nevertheless, the changes in mean triglyceride level between the two groups did not indicate a significant difference.

The meta-analysis revealed a borderline significant 24% relative risk reduction in stroke incidence (risk ratio 0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.57-1.00, p = 0.05).

DCD was borderline significant (SMD = 0.62, p = 0.050, GRADE: Very Low), and SCP was not significant (SMD = 0.55, p = 0.073, GRADE: Very Low), while HCP (SMD = −1.30, p < 0.001, GRADE: Very Low) and HTCP (SMD = −0.46, p = 0.039, GRADE: Very Low) showed significant negative effects.

Age was a borderline significant predictor ( p = 0.05).

However, AKI at presentation was borderline significant ( p = 0.050), and stone volume showed a trend toward significance ( p = 0.096).

The OR at NPAR ≥ 0.92 remains at the borderline significant level ( P = 0.050), but the overall analysis does not support the existence of a threshold effect.

There is also a borderline significant inter- action between birthweight and age at menarche (P = 0.05), with a stronger effect of birthweight in girls with earlier puberty.

The difference in neuron/neurotransmission score between the Sham and NRL groups was borderline significant (−0.4 ± 1.5 vs −4.0 ± 0.9, p = 0.050).

As can be seen in Table 4 , no significant indirect effects were found for any of the FPPs as a mediator in the link between parental general stress at baseline and adolescent zBMI at follow-up, though coercive control was borderline significant as a mediator of this link (b = 0.003, p = 0.05, 95% CI = (−0.0010, 0.0089)) in the unadjusted analyses. 5.

A borderline significant correlation of enterococcal infections (p = 0.05) was seen with female patients.

At this age, there was a borderline significant difference in the E2/E1 ratio with a higher ratio in the NR group [0.76 (0.45–0.95) vs. 0.34 (0.07–0.65); P = 0.050]; however, there were no differences in the E2 concentrations between the two groups; Figures 3A,B .

A borderline significant association was noted for Cit-Fibα36–50 (OR = 5.33; p = 0.05; 95% CI: 1.08–26.18).

A borderline significant positive association between MLR and AST was observed in the combined cohort (r = 0.188, p = 0.050).

5 C – H ); however, PR4 up-regulation was only borderline significant ( P = 0.05).

Although deficiency was more prevalent in hypertensive than normotensive, the association was only borderline significant ( p = 0.05) and did not remain significant after post-hoc correction.