Barely Significant
← all phrases

“did not reach statistical significance”

111,028 sentences · 111,028 papers · 130,054 search hits before verification

In the literature

did not reach statistical significanceP = 0.3627.2× alphaplainly factual
In contrast, neutrophil count (B = 0.714, P = 0.138) showed a positive trend but did not reach statistical significance, while monocyte count (B = 1.768, P = 0.362) was not significantly associated with preeclampsia.
Furthermore, the age at treatment onset showed a trend toward earlier initiation in the pandemic group (8.04 years) compared to the pre-pandemic group (8.65 years), although this difference did not reach statistical significance (p > 0.05).
Furthermore, although the difference between the groups did not reach statistical significance, the IL-6 plasma levels showed a trend reduction over time after the FS was administered (pre–post treatment 8.0 ± 1.73 pg/mL vs. 4.8 ± 1.20 pg/mL) but not after the placebo was administered (pre–post 5.6 ± 0.94 pg/mL vs. 5.01 ± 1.07 pg/mL).
In the subsequent years, a segment with a decreasing trend was identified during 2007–2017 with an APC of -10.6 (95% CI, -13.6 - -7.6; p = < 0.001) and another segment with an increasing trend during 2017–2021 with an APC of 7.2 (95% CI, -6.2–22.5), although the latter did not reach statistical significance as indicated by the confidence interval.
Conversely, as delineated in Table 4 , within the male cohort, irrespective of whether TyG Q1 or TyG Q2 served as the reference, the DR risk associated with TyG Q3 and TyG Q4 did not reach statistical significance, nor was a significant trend of increasing risk observed.