Barely Significant
← all phrases

did not reach statistical significance

75,869 sentences · 75,869 papers · 119,054 search hits before verification

In the literature

a clear trendp = 0.0531.1× alphagold
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.0531.1× alphaplainly factual
Although ITGA11 did not reach statistical significance in the multivariate analysis, it showed a clear trend toward being an independent prognostic risk factor (hazard ratio [95% CI]: 2.024 [0.992–4.131], p = 0.053; Table S7 ).
Intravenous agents (Cangrelor/GPi) showed a trend towards lower risk of intraprocedural stent occlusion compared to oral dAPT (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.30, [95% CI, 0.09–1.01], P = .053), though this did not reach statistical significance.
showed a trendp = 0.0531.1× alpha
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.60812.2× alphaplainly factual
Gross total resection showed a trend toward improved survival (HR = 0.563, 95% CI: 0.315–1.007, p = 0.053), though it did not reach statistical significance. 5-ALA remained non-significant in the multivariable model (HR = 0.885, 95% CI: 0.554–1.413, p = 0.608), suggesting that while it improves resection extent, it does not independently affect survival when accounting for other clinical variables. 3.6.
37 , 38 Regardless RPP status, a strong trend toward an effect of levetiracetam on seizure occurrence was observed ( p = .053), although it did not reach statistical significance—unlike in the PEACH trial, where the prespecified analysis was stratified by baseline NIHSS and study site. 16 Although caution is warranted due to the small sample size, the CAV model with the addition of ASMs demonstrated good predictive performance in our population.
For 30-day readmission, a negative correlation was observed (Spearman’s ρ = -0.158), with the result approaching significance (p = 0.054), implying a possible trend toward fewer readmissions in those with a history of COVID-19, though this did not reach statistical significance.
Regarding the HFHL, the positive correlations observed in the Q2 and Q3 of NHR did not reach statistical significance (Q2: OR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.83 to 1.20; Q3: OR = 1.20, 95% CI: 0.99 to 1.45), and Q4 could be considered as marginally significant (Q4: OR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.00 to 1.46, p = 0.054).