Barely Significant
← all phrases

“did not reach statistical significance”

111,028 sentences · 111,028 papers · 130,054 search hits before verification

In the literature

did not reach statistical significancep > 0.051.0× alphaplainly factual
showed a trendp > 0.051.0× alpha
The analysis revealed that while the SP group showed a trend toward higher median Shannon and Simpson indices compared to the CAP group, these differences did not reach statistical significance ( p > 0.05).
For the KOOS Activities of Daily Living domain, the intraosseous PRGF group also demonstrated significantly better results at 6 months ( p = 0.007) and 12 months ( p = 0.002), though the difference at 3 months did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.050). 3.3.
did not reach statistical significancep -value < 0.051.0× alpha
However, the following factors did not reach statistical significance at a p -value < 0.05 and were not included as risk factors in the multivariate logistic regression model: urban location, low social support, having a big family size, being jobless, advanced age of 45 and above, being unmarried, being uneducated, and substance use (alcohol, smoking, and khat chewing and cannabis).
did not reach statistical significancep -value < 0.051.0× alpha
These associations did not reach statistical significance after FDR correction, but 173 suggestive associations with complement peptide levels with a p -value < 0.05 prior to FDR correction were identified ( Supplementary Table S19 ).
Multivariate analysis confirmed that sarcopenia was an independent negative prognostic factor for OS (HR, 0.257, 95% CI, 0.083–0.794; P = .02) in HCC patients treated with lenvatinib, and was associated with worse PFS although the association did not reach statistical significance (HR, 0.431, 95% CI, 0.185–1.003; P = .05).
However, HDL cholesterol (OR = 2.511, 95% CI: 0.992–6.358, p = 0.052), systolic blood pressure (OR = 0.490, 95% CI: 0.227–1.058, p = 0.069), diastolic blood pressure (OR = 0.445, 95% CI: 0.177–1.118, p = 0.085), and fasting glucose (OR = 1.985, 95% CI: 0.449–8.771, p = 0.366) did not reach statistical significance at p < 0.05, indicating the limited predictive power for WHR in this model.
Incidentally, there were also positive correlations between high mean expression of JAM-A and HER2 and either recurrence-free survival (RFS) or overall survival (OS) in HER2-positive breast cancer patients; however, due to relatively small sample numbers with available genomic data on kmplot.com (882 patients for RFS, 420 patients for OS), these observations did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.05 for RFS and p = 0.12 for OS; data not shown). 3.2.
In addition, epidermal consumption (p = 0.07) and increased mitotic activity (p = 0.05) were more frequent in cases with homozygous 9p21 deletion, but these differences did not reach statistical significance. When the clinical features were considered, there was a statistically significant correlation between 9p21 FISH positivity and the diameter (p < 0.05).