Barely Significant
← all phrases

did not reach statistical significance

111,028 sentences · 111,028 papers · 0 search hits before verification

In the literature

Although the results of metformin (MD: −0.18; 95% CrI: −0.39 to 0.032) and bioactive metabolic regulators (MD: −0.15; 95% CrI: −0.37 to 0.077) did not reach statistical significance, both showed a decreasing trend in HbA1c, ranking second (SUCRA = 0.75) and third (SUCRA = 0.70), respectively.
On the contrary, patients who received GDFT in the study by Bacchin et al had significantly lesser blood loss as compared with controls. 13 This difference could be due to the variable spine pathology and surgical experience of different surgeons in our study. In our study, there was a decreasing trend in the use of intraoperative fluid in the GDFT group which however did not reach statistical significance probably due to the transfusion of less volume of fluid in both groups.
In GC tissues from the Beijing Cancer Hospital, although the difference of BMP8B expression between poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma and moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma did not reach statistical significance, a decreasing trend was also observed (0.00071±0.00035 vs. 0.00237±0.00107) ( Table I ).
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.0881.8× alphaplainly factual
The three-way mixed ANOVA to investigate the effect of subject group, age group, and task on sequencing frequency ( Table 5 ) showed a trend for slower frequencies in the patient group, which, however, did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.088).
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.0701.4× alphaplainly factual
For mandibular range of motion (ROM), the overall repeated-measures model demonstrated a significant main effect of time (GEE p = 0.008), while the group effect was not significant ( p = 0.554) and the Group×Time interaction showed a trend but did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.070).
While the present study showed a trend toward higher in-patient costs for de Gramont (other than to receive chemotherapy) these differences did not reach statistical significance (de Gramont vs Lokich, mean difference=£874, P =0.181, de Gramont vs raltitrexed, mean difference=£828, P =0.206), although this must be considered in the light of the small sample size.