Differences in slopes were highly significant between 0 and 2 doses of ALB ( P = .009) and between 2 and 1 dose ( P = .004) but not significant between 1 and 0 dose ( P = .419).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
Following TARGIT-IORT there was an increase of 0.203 foci per cell (range −1.436 to 1.275) compared with 0.935 foci per cell (range −0.679 to 2.216) in the EBRT group; this difference was highly significant (p = 0.009).
Across three different ethnicities studied (Caucasian Europeans, African-Americans, and Hispanics), a highly significant association was found of long repeats with heroin addiction ( P = 0.009).
Though the mortality difference was highly significant (absolute risk reduction of 30% for hospital mortality, p = 0.009, NNT = 3.3), only one or two deaths in the hydrocortisone group would have been sufficient to tip the balance toward a non-significant mortality difference and in favor of study continuation, rather than early termination of the trial.
However, the presence of a female leader had a strong and highly significant effect on the tendency for males to approach simulated intruders ( B = 4.73, SE = 1.81, z = 2.62, N = 34, P = 0.009; Fig. 1d ).
This is in contrast with the highly significant correlation between ADOSE and ATSUI (r = 0.497; p < 0.009).
There was a highly significant correlation between the relative amount of A350V IQSEC2 and Arf6-GTP ( r = 0.77, p = 0.009).
There was no significant negative correlation between the change in the global methylation degree of CpG1 and gene expression ( r = −0.462, p = 0.357), of which the change in the degree of methylation of 17 CpG sites was negatively correlated with gene expression, and the mC-20 site showed a highly significant negative correlation with gene expression ( r = −0.920, p = 0.009).
Again, the difference was highly significant (Mantel-Haenszel chi-square = 6.8743, p = 0.009).
This difference was most evident in the earlier stage group (stage 1 to 2) with median overall survival of 30.0 months (95% CI: 26.4 to 35.1 months) in the warfarin group compared to 23.7 months (95% CI: 19.6 to 31.8 months) in the DOAC group, yielding a highly significant HR of 1.24 (95% CI: 1.06 to 1.45, p = 0.009).
However, when groups were matched for both CCR5 promoter haplotype and age (n=6 for both) reduced CCR5 density on monocytes in controllers relative to HCs was highly significant ( P =0.009).
As well as, there was a highly significant correlation between MCHC and HGB ( r = 0.454 ∗∗ , P =0.009) as shown in ( Table 5 ). 3.6.
We observed a highly significant positive correlation between the %LG and the number of advantageous choices made in the rIGT during the last block of 10 trials (n = 24, r = 0.521, p = 0.009; Figure 2A ).
The difference over time to develop each stage of the phenotype was highly significant between the two populations (St2: p = 0.009; St3: p < 0.0001, St4: p = 0.0033).
Comparison of the entire group (n=8) showed highly significant down-regulation when quantitated by relative densitometry units (p<0.009).
These results for fried foods remained highly significant after adjusting for other food and beverage intake and all a priori covariates (OR = 3.38, 95% CI:3.38–1.36, P = 0.009 for intake o f ≥ 5 serv/wk., and OR = 1.80, 95% CI:1.8–1.08, P = 0.02 for intake of 2–4 serv/wk. versus none).
The “time” and “school type” interaction was also highly significant ( p -value = 0.009) which showed that the mean scores of public school students were initially lower than those of private schools in both the baseline (5.0 v/s 5.2) and posttest I (5.7 v/s 6.1).
Interestingly, there was a highly significant correlation between the expression of ARK5 and SIRT3 ( P = 0.009).
There was no significant variation with the distribution of sex but there was a highly significant variation of the SCC among different age groups (P<0.009) where the highest incidence was reported in patients above 70 years old (12/34 cases, 35.3%) followed by 40-70 years (six cases in the age range of 41-50 years, five cases in the age range of 51-60 years, and six cases in the age range of 61-70 years) (Table 3 ).
This became particularly evident when we compared men and women in this cognitively healthy subsample: there was a highly significant association between MVR and cognition in men (β = −0.300, SE = 0.115, p = 0.009) whereas the association was not significant in women (β = −0.037, SE = 0.105, p = 0.723).
The Kaplan-Meier curve showed a highly significant difference in overall survival of patients with high expression ( n = 78) and low expression ( n = 65) groups ( p = 0.009, Figure 2 ).
The difference among subgroups is highly significant (p = 0.009 and p = 0.003 according the actuarial and the actual approaches, respectively).
The results indicated that even after adjusting for age, the clinical status (‘Group’) remained a highly significant factor explaining the community variance ( R 2 = 0.385, p = 0.009).
When we performed a paired analysis with the corresponding normal tissues, a highly significant difference in H 2 O 2 production was found in BRAF + TERT ( p = 0.009), BRAF only ( p = 0.003), ALL BRAF ( p < 0.0001), RET or RAS mutated ( p = 0.02), and ALL MUT tumors ( p < 0.0001) but not in non-mutated PTCs ( p = 0.12) ( Figure 2 , panel B). 3.3.
The HR for BNP in Q4 was 2.32 (95% CI, 1.24-4.35) as compared to Q1, which was statistically highly significant, p = 0.009.