“highly significant”

In addition to that, Cl demonstrated highly significant anti-inflammatory ( p < 0.0001) and anti-senescence ( p < 0.0001) effects.

The comparison of regional deformation parameters measured in subsequent left ventricular segments indicated highly significant linear relationship of values from both methods ( p < 0.0001), although correlation coefficients for measurements performed at baseline were slightly higher than during peak stage of dobutamine test.

Data are presented in Table 5 and revealed a highly significant association for osteitis at the radius and the three-year radiolunate cartilage score ( P = 0.0001).

Discrimination based on NEXN expression was highly significant within the data set of Taylor et al , however in this case low gene expression was associated with poor prognosis (log-rank P≤0.0001).

Statistical analysis confirmed that this reduction is highly significant ( p < 0.0001), indicating a pronounced structural distinction between both fiber populations.

Specifically, in the Tris-sucrose buffer group, increasing the concentration from 15 mg/mL to 45 mg/mL resulted in a highly significant increase in protein expression ( p < 0.0001).

The outcome from ANOVA showed that the rutting quadratic regression model was highly significant because its F-value of 105.16 was high and had a relatively low probability value ( p < 0.0001), implying that the chosen model is significant statistically.

In contrast, the TB cohort was much more sensitive to host-filtering stringency: both TB-negative and TB-positive groups exhibited markedly higher non-host fractions under the relaxed mode than under the strict mode, with highly significant within-sample differences ( p < 0.0001; Figure 2 A).

Bold values indicate highly significant main effect of infection (p < 0.0001), asterisks indicate significant time by infection interaction, and italics indicates no significant main effect (significant interaction only).

Given that these two gene expression measurements were conducted independently and on different RNA extraction batches, the observed agreement in fold change for 110/161 genes is highly significant (one-tailed Fisher’s Exact Test, p < 0.0001; Additional file 2 : Table S4).

The results showed highly significant main effects (all p < 0.0001, Supplementary Material Table S4 ) regarding nebulizer type, placement position, and artificial airway type.

2 A–C) showed highly significant (time p < 0.0001 F 7,414 = 28.83, group:time p < 0.0001 F 21,414 = 66.58) differences in the BOLD time-course response to fenfluramine between the groups.

The overall multivariate log-rank test was highly significant (chi-squared = 71.16, p < 0.0001), confirming significant differences in conversion-free survival across dose groups.

VE/VO 2 showed a highly significant difference during the first 20 s of recovery ( p = 0.0001, r = 0.834, 95% CI: −5.05 to −3.06), whereas no significant differences were observed during the subsequent 20–40 s and 40–60 s intervals ( p > 0.05).

The data on disease severity revealed highly significant differences ( p < 0.0001) (Table 1 ) in the percentage of necrotic leaf area (%NLA) and pycnidia coverage (%PC) between the isolates, wheat differential lines, and their two-way interactions (Table 2 ).

The highly significant p-values (p-value < 0.0001) for the likelihood ratio, score, and Wald tests indicate that the model as a whole fits significantly better than an intercept-only model, confirming that the inclusion of explanatory variables provides a meaningful contribution to predicting adherence levels ( Table 2 ).

Three days following sepsis the two models had an inverse correlation that was highly significant (p<0.0001) with an r = −0.284 ( Figure 4C ).

These differences in allele distribution were statistically highly significant (χ 2 = 75.945, df = 2, p < 0.0001), which confirms a strong association between APOE allele status and disease status.

Using the comparison of the resulting log-likelihood values from running the model with and without the tree to estimate significance, both replicates produced highly significant (p<0.0001) heritability estimates of 5.8% (CI 2.9–8.7%) and 5.6% (CI 2.6–8.5%; Table 2 ).

The rectification index for cells from normal eyes was 0.97 ± 0.04 ( n = 14) compared to 0.52 ± 0.03 in retinas from HT eyes ( n = 13), a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001).

We first compared the effects of the cytosolic PLA2 inhibitor AACOCF3 on macrophage cytokine production in response to TBWCL and identified a highly significant effect on Mtb-induced TNF secretion at the 10 μM dose ( Figure 2C ; P < 0.0001).

The global correlation across all time points remained highly significant (ρ = 0.65, p < 10 −4 ).

While the difference in ORR was not statistically significant ( p = 0.2867), the difference in DCR was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

Both our cohort and that of Morris et al had a highly significant paired 2-tailed t test for Na + 1 ≠ Na + 2 ( P < 0.0001).

Using the same background subtraction procedure, a lifetime of 2.5 ± 0.03 ns was obtained for EGFR–eGFP in the presence of EGF and Grb2–mRFP. A Student’s t test revealed that the difference in apparent lifetimes (2.85 vs 2.50 ns) was highly significant ( p < 0.0001, standard error about the mean 0.03 ns, sample size = 50).