Barely Significant
← all phrases

near-significant

2,146 sentences · 2,146 papers · 5,323 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Listed by Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

Despite common claims in practice, core training did not demonstrate significant improvements in maximal strength, and showed only near-significant effects on vertical jump performance while demonstrating limited or non-significant effects on speed, flexibility, change of direction, technical skills, and throwing performance.
Only adjusted p -values are reported and an adjusted p -value cutoff of 0.05 was used for determining statistical significance while adjusted p -values between 0.05 and 0.10 were considered “near-significant.” General data processing was performed using Python version 3.9.10 ( Van Rossum and Drake Jr, 1995 ), Numpy version 1.23.4 ( Harris et al., 2020 ), and Pandas version 1.5.1 ( McKinney, 2010 ; The pandas development team, 2022 ).
To facilitate interpretation and transparent reporting of the results, the following graphical outputs are pre-specified as part of the analytical plan: (a) Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves displaying sensitivity versus 1-specificity for each individual biomarker showing significant or near-significant bivariate associations with treatment response, as well as for the combined multivariable models (Elastic Net and Random Forest), enabling visual comparison of univariate versus multivariate discriminative performance; (b) a dot plot or bar chart of variable importance scores derived from the Elast
In addition, a greedy approach was taken, in which the fold-change of near-significant DEGs (fold-change >4), meeting the aforementioned quality criteria, were also included to more closely examine the expression behavior of genes annotated to specific canonical signaling pathways of interest, identified in Figure 2a (see Figure 2b ).
In particular, our (near-significant) results regarding the analysis of adjuvant systemic treatment, as well as those of the separate analysis of subcohorts with different counts of treated metastases, could both benefit from larger sample sizes, in order to clearly define the potential influence of these factors on PFS and OS.
No significant differences were found in AVLT measures of short-term memory span (the first trial), learning process (sum of tests 1–5), or general index of encoding and retrieval (correct answers in delayed free recall trial), which suggests that the 2 groups do not differ in episodic memory, although some near-significant subtle differences were observed.