near-significantgold
OU-CMR decreases hospital admissions and has demonstrated a strong near-significant trend towards decreasing index hospitalization cost.
OU-CMR decreases hospital admissions and has demonstrated a strong near-significant trend towards decreasing index hospitalization cost.
Kim et al., 2022 [ 57 ] observed a near-significant association between increased proximity to incinerators and the prevalence of physician-diagnosed allergic rhinitis in a Korean study.
We noted a near-significant negative trend in laparoscopic urological procedures, with a P value of 0.05.
Besides LDH changes, some analytes, such as calcium and cholesterol, showed near-significant changes in elder participants, and their samples appeared to be more sensitive to a delay in measurement and storage temperature.
Across both indices, diversity increased with larval stage, but the Shannon index model had a near-significant interaction of stage and treatment as NI larvae showed no change in diversity across different stages ( Fig. 2B ; Fig.
The near-significant inverse association with APACHE II in this group raises the possibility of a “ceiling effect,” whereby severe obesity constrains metabolic responsiveness regardless of acute physiological stress [ 43 ].
Effects of participant sex in our study were also in the same direction as those in O'Gorman et al.'s study: they found a near-significant tendency for women to express more sympathy for the group member in the helping scenario (this was significant in our study, as was desire to help), but in neither study did participant sex have effects on anger towards the transgressor or contributions to help.
Similar to our findings, TG levels exhibited a near-significant association with aortic stiffness, whereas TCH levels did not.
A third variable (language spoken at home) had a near-significant association.
At most, we found a near-significant interaction of instruction and rotation size for proprioceptive recalibration, likely due to the smaller proprioceptive shift for the instructed 60 group compared to non-instructed 60° group.
Non-RdRp sequences that share near-significant similarity with RdRp are also characterized.
KT increased PON1 mass for both HD and PD patients, with near-significant p values of 0.07 and 0.06, respectively ( Table 1 ).
For instance, having an uncooperative spouse (B = 2.290, p = 0.055) showed a near-significant positive relationship with work-family conflict, indicating that spousal support (or lack thereof) might still play a role in conflict levels.
We also found near-significant effects in the right amygdala and right superior temporal cortex.
This near-significant difference reflects the "satisfaction-function discordance" described in chronic pain conditions, where objective dysfunction (e.g., CEO's fertility impairment) may be psychologically offset by effective symptom management [ 17 ].
Variables that showed significant or near-significant differences between groups by univariate analysis or that were otherwise considered relevant for the study were entered in a conditional logistic regression analysis and in a multiple regression analysis.
The same category showed near-significant differences for group 1 versus group 3 (p adj = 0.068) and group 2 versus group 4 (p adj = 0.055), while within-range exposure differed nominally between groups 1 and 3 (raw p = 0.018) but lost significance after correction (p adj = 0.107).
The number of CD8 + T lymphocytes increased to a significant degree in the draining lymph nodes of animals treated with XRT alone, and to a near-significant degree in animals treated with combination therapy ( Figure 3(c )).
ITT analysis revealed a near-significant change in LVEF at recovery (coefficient 4.10, 95 % CI 0.01–8.20).
Although the between-group difference in gender distribution did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.067), the near-significant result suggested a potential influence on outcomes; therefore, gender was included as a covariate in subsequent analyses.
There was a near-significant increase in absolute measurement difference as lesion size increased and a significant decrease in relative measurement difference as lesion size increased.
Of note, these longitudinal analyses showed near-significant increases over time in the regression coefficients (ie., the slopes of the best fit lines from the scatter plots) for the correlations between CCR5/FPRL1 usage (β increases from 0.232 to 0.336; p = 0.083) and CCR5/CCR3 usage (β increases from 0.222 to 0.417; p = 0.091), but not CCR5/CCR8 usage (β remains unchanged; p = 0.993) (Table 1 ).
Excluding Callahan data, the only near-significant differences in JTI slope upon z-PC1 were between Adams Stage 2 and its Stage 3 ( Table 8 ).
However, there were still near-significant p values in some of the secondary outcomes, and it is possible that type II errors were present due to the smallness of the sample.
Objectively measured PA showed no significant effects in either intervention group, except for a near-significant MVPA increase of 107 min/week [95% CI: 4; 209] over time in ExG.