Barely Significant
← all phrases

nearly significant

3,288 sentences · 3,288 papers · 3,797 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.0579p=0.06

Listed by Hankins, posted since · Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

Conversely, a strong, positive, nearly significant correlation between the percentage of CD4 + T cells and the magnitude of ADCC obtained with IgA-depleted plasma was found ( Fig. 6 , right), indicating that eliminating IgA-mediated interference strengthens the association between ADCC and the percentage of CD4 + T cells (higher r coefficient) and also the significance (lower P value) of this association.
Notable were satisfaction ( Z C1 = −2.67; p C1 = 0.008; r C1 = 0.47; Z C2 = −1.66; p C2 = 0.097; r C2 = 0.29; pre-test: M C1 = 3.57; SD C1 = 0.48; M C2 = 3.50; SD C2 = 0.50; post-test: M C1 = 4.91; SD C1 = 0.47; M C2 = 3.56; SD C2 = 0.46) and autonomy ( Z C1 = −2.67; p C1 = 0.008; r C1 = 0.47; Z C2 = −1.65; p C2 = 0.098; r C2 = 0.29; pre-test: M C1 = 3.58; SD C1 = 0.42; M C2 = 3.50; SD C2 = 0.47; post-test: M C1 = 4.51; SD C1 = 0.39; M C2 = 3.54; SD C2 = 0.47), where the difference in C2 was nearly significant.
castaneum from traps in two spaces of mill 1 during Year 2 were compared with counts of beetles from samples of siftings collected in the finished flour, the correlation coefficients were nearly significant for both sets of traps. red flour beetle Typhaea stercorea Cryptolestes ferrugineus pheromone traps stored products methyl bromide phosphine pmc-status-qastatus 0 pmc-status-live yes pmc-status-embargo no pmc-status-released yes pmc-prop-open-access yes pmc-prop-olf no pmc-prop-manuscript no pmc-prop-legally-suppressed no pmc-prop-has-pdf yes pmc-prop-has-supplement no pmc-prop-pdf-only no pmc-prop-suppress-copyright no pmc-prop-is-real-version no pmc-prop-is-scanned-article no pmc-prop-preprint no pmc-prop-in-epmc yes pmc-license-ref CC BY 1.
Results Adult females and males breeding at owl sites had significantly shorter telomeres at the end of the chick-rearing stage than adults at control sites, and the nearly significant predator presence-by-sex interaction indicates that the differences in telomere length between owl- and control-site individuals could be more pronounced in males than in females (predator presence F 1,17.3 = 6.47, p = 0.02; sex F 1,14.79 = 8.45, p = 0.01; predator presence × sex F 1, 14.79 = 4.50, p = 0.05; Fig. 1 a).