Barely Significant
← all phrases

“showed a trend”

53,323 sentences · 53,323 papers · 65,371 search hits before verification

In the literature

showed a trendP = 0.061.2× alpha
In Cox proportional hazards models, high biomarker levels showed a trend toward conferring a higher risk of “not getting off treatment” as compared to low biomarker levels (for Gal‐9, hazard ratio [HR] 0.32, P = 0.06; for TNFRII, HR 0.24, P = 0.08; for CXCL10, HR 0.39, P = 0.1; for Gal‐1, HR 0.41, P = 0.1).
showed a trendp=0.061.2× alpha
In a study of 964 STEMI patients ( 7 ), adverse LV remodeling group showed a trend toward longer symptom-onset-to-balloon time than non-LV remodeling group (182 vs. 165 min, p=0.06), which was consistent with the present study (ischemic time ≥3 vs. <3 hours).
showed a trendP =0.061.2× alpha
Finally, the stratified analysis according to the stage of melanoma revealed that PDE5i use was associated with a significantly increased risk for in situ melanoma (two studies, 16 , 20 adjusted RR =1.31, 95% CI =1.01–1.69, P =0.04, I 2 =69%; Figure 4B ), showed a trend toward increased risk for localized melanoma (three studies, 16 , 20 adjusted RR =1.13, 95% CI =0.99–1.29, P =0.06, I 2 =23%; Figure 4B ), and showed a trend toward reduced risk for nonlocalized melanoma (three studies, 16 , 20 adjusted RR =0.79, 95% CI =0.62–1.01, P =0.06, I 2 =0%; Figure 4B ).
showed a trendP = 0.061.2× alpha
Recently, a randomized trial [ 52 ] on TACE versus proton therapy for hepatocarcinoma showed a trend toward improved 2-year PFS (31% vs. 48%, P = 0.06) and 2-year LC (45% vs. 88%, P = 0.06) favoring proton therapy, although the difference was not statistically significant.
New frontiers in proton therapy: applications in cancers.
Cancer Commun (Lond) · 2019 · PMC6805548
showed a trendp=0.061.2× alpha
Spontaneous inhibitory postsynaptic current (sIPSC) frequency recorded on M/T cells showed a trend toward increase after implicit learning (p=0.06, Kruskal-Wallis Anova followed by FDR-corrected permutation test, Enriched, n = 50 and Non-Enriched, n = 48) (for detailed statistics see Table 1 ), ( Figure 1H and Figure 1—source data 1 ) with no change in amplitude ( Table 1 , Enriched n = 48 and Non-Enriched, n = 46).
showed a trendP=0.061.2× alpha
Summed scores showed a trend in the differences between Med-2 (30.55 ± 4.96), Med-3 (28.78 ± 6.25) and Med-4 (33.20 ± 6.41) students on perceptions around training (P=0.06), where Med-3 students tended to have lower scores than Med-2 or Med-4 students, although this was not statistically significant unless where indicated on the individual questions reported previously.