Barely Significant
← all phrases

“showed a trend”

53,323 sentences · 53,323 papers · 65,371 search hits before verification

In the literature

showed a trendP = 0.0951.9× alpha
Starch-Derived and Total Glucose Oxidation in Response to the 13 C Starch Bolus Analysis of 13 C enrichment in expired CO 2 , as a qualitative indication of the oxidation of exogenous 13 C starch, showed a trend for a diet × time interaction in males ( P = 0.095), and a main effect of the post-weaning diet ( P < 0.05; Figure S2a ).
showed a trendp = 0.0951.9× alpha
Notably, patients fulfilling NEDA-3 T1 status at y6 showed unchanged sNfL levels (y0, 4.9 pg/mL (3.3–8.1); y6, 5.4 pg/mL (4.1–6.8); Wilcoxon test, p = 0.955), whereas patients with EDA T1 , probably in terms of regression to the mean, 4 showed a trend toward a decrease in sNfL levels from 10.2 pg/mL (y0, 5.8–14.8) to 8.2 pg/mL (y6, 6.3–12.3; Wilcoxon test, p = 0.095; Figure 2B ).
showed a trendp = .0951.9× alpha
The ‘high’ invasion front showed a trend towards higher velocity in 30 PSU (Welch's test, t 17.488 = 1.76, p = .095), significantly higher velocity in 25 PSU ( t 17.488 = 2.38, p = .029) and 20 PSU ( t 28.79 = 3.14, p = .004) and significantly lower velocity at 1 PSU ( t 31.557 = −2.34, p = .026), compared with the ‘low’ invasion front.
showed a trendp = 0.0951.9× alpha
Further conforming to this pattern, the direct comparison of cycle phases within genotype groups revealed two statistical trends, with the Met-homozygotes showing a slight reduction in avoidance learning capacity [stay frequency non–reward ± SEM: Early = 69.2 ± 4.2%; Late = 76.5 ± 3.8%; t (11) = −2.17, p = 0.052, d = 0.60], while the Val-carriers showed a trend-wise increase in this capability [non-reward stay frequency ± SEM: Early = 74.2 ± 3.0%; Late = 70.4 ± 2.7%; t (28) = 1.73, p = 0.095, d = 0.31] (see Figures 1C,D ).
showed a trendp = 0.0951.9× alpha
When comparing OLP with DBP we found that OLP was superior to DBP with respect to TNSS (12 h, Z = − 2.68, p = 0.007, Bonferroni corrected p = 0.021, r = 0.41; TNSS 2 weeks, p > 0.10) and showed a trend for significance for CSMS (12 h, Z = − 1.67, p = 0.095, corrected p > 0.10, r = 0.26; 2 weeks, Z = − 1.80, p = 0.073, corrected p > 0.10, r = 0.28) (RQLQ, p > 0.10).