Excerpts

Apart from measuring these individual behaviours, we intended our coding scheme to capture the episodes of infant-parent dyadic interactions and various parental behaviours focused on the infant looking that are possibly significant for task performance, but rarely considered task-relevant.

To a lesser degree, education and job training contributed to impacts of the program on child engagement of the parent during play (a statistical trend) and on children’s cognitive development.

Marginal significance was found for Financial Insecurity and Internalized Shame.

01) showed an increasing trend over the years.

We also observed the typical interactions between Alerting × Congruency, F (1,112) = 9.03, p = 0.003, η p 2 = 0.08, and Orienting × Congruency, F (2,224) = 4.33, p = 0.014, η p 2 = 0.04; the Alerting × Orienting interaction, F (2,224) = 2.93, p = 0.055, η p 2 = 0.03, was marginally significant.

Interestingly, the migraine group did not report significantly greater discomfort overall, despite a reliable trend of increased ratings of discomfort.

No main or interaction effects approached significance.

However, it should be noted that, the spatial cueing effect of inverted face was only marginally significant in the previous study.

Computation of Trend Estimates in PISA In the literature on trend analysis in international large-scale assessments, the original trend is distinguished from a marginal trend ( Gebhardt and Adams, 2007 ; see also Carstensen, 2013 ; Sachse et al., 2016 ).

In panel C, there is a decreasing trend in the PBA mode, but the trend in the CBA mode remains constant.

It is evident that the average item difficulty of this group decreased significantly from 2003 to 2012 (−0.18 to 0.01 = −0.19 logits), indicating that there was a positive trend in mathematics over the 9 years.

This influence is indeed highly significant (the correlation coefficient value ranges from 0.9333 to 1.000).

In addition, while knowledge of services did not predict well-being, the predictive effects of usefulness of services ( β = 0.08, p = 0.05) and evaluation of services ( β = 0.07, p = 0.062) on well-being were significant/marginally significant.

Our results did not show any differences between males and females for RPE, EC, and VO 2 ; however, BF was significantly higher in females, and HR and V E were close to significance level.

In continuation of this, it is also possible that our large sample of patients with MDD and healthy controls has transformed small differences in affective memory bias into borderline significant differences.

At the beginning of the period analysed there was an increasing trend in the total costs (in euros) of the telecare programme in Castilla y León.

The difference was significant when analyzing the internal event category and marginally significant when analyzing the total number of details reported.

Because none of the interactions approached significance ( p s > 0.20), these were removed from the final model.

The conceptual framework underlying narrative therapy ( White and Epston, 1989 ) and narrative exposure therapy ( Neuner et al., 2002 ) is to view the collection of life events that a person has experienced as a library of personal stories and to recognize that a certain number of these stories may be significant determinants of identity, commonly known in the PTSD literature as “self-defining memories” (e.g., Conway and Pleydell-Pearce, 2000 ; Sutherland and Bryant, 2005 ; Singer et al., 2013 ).

It has been found that students with higher levels of critical thinking ability tend to use discourse synthesis, planning, and evaluation strategies more frequently, with a clear trend of high-level thinkers using these strategies more than medium-level thinkers, who in turn use them more than low-level thinkers.

Dual-identity was significantly associated with emotional exhaustion via the perception of job complexity under low (indirect effect = 0.08, 95% CI = [0.04, 0.11]) and high HRM strength (indirect effect = 0.04, 95% CI = [0.01, 0.06]), and the difference was marginally significant (diff = −0.04, 95% CI = [−0.08, 0.00], 90% CI = [−0.08, −0.01]).

Follow-up analyses suggested that it was easier for participants to choose a piece of chocolate when presented with few rather than a lot of alternatives, but this effect was only marginally significant.

In terms of confidence ratings for each test, the effect was significant or marginally significant, with higher scores in the 2D map-assisted field navigation learning group.

In summary, there were clearly significant factors driving down performance in our experiment compared to the SoloBARD experiment, and there may have been an interaction effect that contributed one way or the other to our effect sizes.

(2023) reported a marginally significant positive association of child-centered beliefs supporting language education embedded in daily routines and an aspect of interaction quality and also a negative association of teacher-directed beliefs supporting additional language programs and another aspect of interaction quality.