Barely Significant

Excerpts

6,422 sentences · 1 filter applied

Additionally, despite the fact that the effect of group membership on ICE was only marginally significant, the significant indirect effect of group membership on allocations via anticipated cooperative emotions suggests that the difference in allocation behavior between majority and minority groups is, at least in part, explained by differences in anticipated emotions.
Integration of previous results Preliminary univariate analyses (using t-values, p -values, and R 2 ) indicated differences in the expected direction—for example, higher scores in social anxiety/shyness and social retraction for the NAP group—but these effects showed marginal significance and limited explained variance ( R 2 between 0.022 and 0.044).
It is worth noting that, like in Study 1, the (non-significant) relationship between students' generational status and ASC showed a positive trend, suggesting that these students could experience positive self-perceptions based on the fact that, compared to their parents, they had activated the social elevator and were involved in social mobility processes.
While a facilitation effect (neutral > female) for female faces was evident from both RTs and percentage of correct responses (in both identity and associative words), we found neither a facilitation nor an interference effect for male faces (RTs for identity words showed a trend toward facilitation, but this did not reach significance).
We identified three different trajectories which characterized three profiles of students: a profile with constant high levels of positive affect (Constant High PA), a profile showing an increasing trend of positive affect over the 7 days of assessment (Increasing PA), and a profile showing a decreasing trend (Decreasing PA).