Barely Significant

Excerpts

6,422 sentences · 1 filter applied

Roles and Responsibilities of the Manager and Super User In the analysis of allocation of the roles and responsibilities between management and super users, a clear trend emerged indicating the importance of the fact that the super user is part of an organizational learning culture, and that the organization’s cultural maturity is an important factor in how the super user should work with the existing learning culture within the organization.
However, in this study, no open-ended responses explicitly used terms such as “spiritual” or “religious.” Therefore, it is predicted that even if Japanese travelers experience substantial spiritual changes through TTE, they may not recognize these changes as “spiritual.” This tendency suggests that while the transformative effects of TTE may be significant, their interpretation within the Japanese cultural context does not necessarily align with conventional Western conceptions of spirituality. 6.4.
(2018) explored age-related differences in amygdala response and found a trend wise negative linear association between amygdala activity and face trustworthiness in young adults, but older adults showed a trend wise positive quadratic relationship (i.e., high and low compared to moderate face trustworthiness was associated with greater amygdala activity).
placebo administration as between-subject factor a sample size of 64 participants per treatment group is necessary to obtain sufficient power (80%) to detect a moderate effect of oxytocin on social cognition (see Supplementary Material for details regarding the interaction we observed between treatment group and face trustworthiness level, which were not statistical significant as per our alpha level cut off, but approached significance).
Distinguishing Between Invoking Theory and Using Theory Even among reviews reporting at least one supportive association between theory usage and outcomes, effect sizes have been generally small, inconsistent, only marginally significant, or questionable upon inspection of the interval estimates (Kim et al., 1997 ; Ammerman et al., 2002 ; Noar et al., 2007 ; Taylor et al., 2012 ).