Excerpts

Furthermore, there was a trend toward significance in the anger accuracy rate of the ChatGPT-3.5 compared to the TD group ( p = 0.053), but not compared to the ASD group ( p = 0.11).

The effect of arithmetic level was only of borderline significance for the counting slopes: F (1, 79) = 3.86, p = 0.053; η 2 = 0.047.

Subjective Quality of Life Supporting H1c, analysis revealed a marginally significant effect of pre-retirement multiple identities at Step 1 (β = 0.16, p = 0.053) that explained 2% of the total variance.

There was a marginally significant effect of ratio, F (2, 104) = 3.02, p = 0.053, The Developing Mental Number Line: Does Its Directionality Relate to 5- to 7-Year-Old Children’s Mathematical Abilities? = 0.055, and a linear contrast analysis revealed a statistically significant linear trend, F (1, 55) = 4.45, p = 0.040, η p 2 = 0.079, such that performance improved as ratio decreased (e.g., better performance for a ratio of 4:7 than 4:5), as expected.

Paired samples t -tests revealed that the discrimination effect was only significant in the LF region [ t (19) = 3.49, p = 0.002], and marginally significant in the RF region [ t (19) = 2.07, p = 0.053].

The correlations between performance in both types of tasks and compensatory strategies were significantly negative for “repeat self-instructions” and “instructional comprehension” (see Table 4 ), meanwhile they were marginally significant between performance in “vigilance” and “instructor verbalizations” ( r = −0.29, p = 0.053).

For the MBSR group, Δlow-beta power in resting 1 for the Pz site was found to have a negative correlation with ΔDERS ( b =−0.50, p =0.040), Δtheta in breathing for the Pz site had a marginally significant negative correlation with ΔFFMQ ( b =−0.48, p =0.053), Δlow-beta in body-scan for the Fz site had a marginally significant negative correlation with ΔFFMQ ( b =−0.48, p =0.054), Δalpha in resting 2 for both Fz ( b =−0.64, p =0.006) and Pz sites ( b =−0.51, p =0.036) showed a negative correlation with ΔFFMQ, and Δtheta in resting 2 for the Pz site had a marginally significant negative correlation with ΔFFMQ ( b =−0.47, p =0.058).

When removing scores for these three sentence pairs from the dataset, the t -test becomes only marginally significant (one word: M = 22.03, SD = 83.39, two word: M = 77.60, SD = 133.28, comparison: t = 2.007, p = 0.053).

well-aligned also approached significance ( post hoc p = 0.0535).

Second, the relationship between procedural justice and turnover intention approached significance ( p = 0.054), although it did not reach the conventional threshold of p < 0.05.

Dexterity was a marginally significant predictor, β = 0.221, p = 0.054, whereas graphomotor skill was not, β = −0.183, p = 0.110.

The time x attitude interaction was found to be marginally significant, F (2, 126) = 2.94, p = 0.054, partial η 2 = 0.05.

In the remaining two trials there was significant to a marginally significant difference of below chance looking [second: t(17) = −2.61, p = 0.054; third: t (16) = −2.82, p = 0.036].

In Sample 2, this relationship was only marginally significant (β = −0.117, p = 0.054) after taking into account the effects of age, gender, and previous mental health help-seeking. 4 Discussion This study is the first to examine the psychosocial and mental health correlations of perceived teacher support after taking into account the effects of childhood trauma in a cross-cultural context.

Bonferroni corrected pairwise comparisons indicated HR-ASD looked at the referent less than LR controls (marginally significant at p = 0.054) and HR-TYP ( p < 0.001).

There was a marginally significant trial effect ( EST = −3.65, SE = 1.89, t = −1.93, p = 0.054).

Results indicated that the model became significant, and also showed a trend toward significant improvement over the second step [ F (6, 144) = 2.12, p = 0.054, R = 0.29, adjusted R 2 = 0.04, Δ R 2 = 0.02, p = 0.058, f 2 = 0.08, power = 0.83].

N170 Amplitude The ANOVA for N170 peak amplitude ( Table 4 and Figure 5 ) also showed a significant main effect of emotion types [ F (1,44)=6.62, p =0.014, η 2 =0.13] and a marginally significant four-way interaction among emotion type, cue validity, electrode location, and age [ F (1,44)=3.93, p =0.054, η 2 =0.08].

The fear of contagion by COVID-19 decreased as time passed since the start of the pandemic, and this difference was almost significant ( p = 0.054) when comparing the data between 2020 and 2021.

However, the only allopregnanolone association that survived robust regression was the one with SERT binding in the prefrontal cortex (slope = -0.011, SD = 0.003, β = -0.196, p < 0.001), whereas the robust regressions between allopregnanolone and SERT binding in the pallidostriatum and hippocampus were in borderline significance (pallidostriatum; slope = -0.162, SD = 0.083, β = -0.236, p = 0.054, hippocampus; slope = -0.049, SD = 0.027, β = -0.187, p = 0.071).

Also, her word translation skills revealed a slight trend toward significance in L1–L2 (Crawford’s t -test = -1.82, p = 0.054, z cc = -4.25) but no deficit in the L2–L1 direction (Crawford’s t -test = 0.50, p = 0.466, z cc = -1.38) ( Figure 2C ).

For the younger subjects, the linear fit was borderline significant [ F (1,2) = 17.17; p = 0.054; R 2 = 0.896] and the logarithmic fit was significant [ F (1,2) = 58.83; p = 0.017; R 2 = 0.967].

Local Cue When a red cup marked the goal location (Figure 2A ), the difference between groups just failed to reach significance [ F (2,64) = 3.046, P = 0.054, η p 2 = 0.087, power = 0.570], although individuals with DS ( M = 0.899, SE = 0.026) made fewer correct choices than TD adults ( M = 0.997, SE = 0.030; P = 0.017).

The post-hoc multiple comparisons (Bonferroni-corrected) revealed a marginally significant difference between the four- and five-year-old children on ANS accuracy (95% Confidence Interval [−21.06, 0.14], p = 0.054), but the difference between the four- and six-year-old group was not significant (95% CI [−17.92, 2.76], p = 0.221).

There is, however, a marginally significant interaction between measurement points and SES clusters in the Satisfaction with Life Scale [ F (2, 182) = 2.97, p = 0.054, η p 2 = 0.032].