Although Fringe Benefits was marginally significant in the regression model ( p = 0.048), the corresponding confidence interval of the odds ratio included values very close to the null (OR = 0.80, 95% CI [0.65, 0.998]), suggesting that the effect might be weak or unstable.
Excerpts
A significant trend was evident among residents exposed since before 1995 (IRR=1.18, p=0.048), and was slightly stronger among residents exposed since before 1995 and 1990 ( Table 2 ).
Although there was a slightly significant result for cJSW ( p = 0.048), we were unable to find any overall differences in the mean values for the different fracture locations.
Meanwhile, our patients undergoing thoracic surgery had no significant difference in mild pain ( p = 0.083) and a marginally significant difference in moderate to severe pain ( p = 0.048) in comparison of patients undergoing surgery of skin and connective tissue ( Table 2 ), which might have resulted from the intraoperative intercostal nerve block prescribed in patients undergoing thoracic surgery.
Moreover, there was a marginally significant unadjusted effect of AXIN1 rs1805105 variant in the recessive gene model ( p = 0.048, OR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.25–1.01) and after adjusting for maternal age group, AXIN1 rs1805105 gene variant was significantly associated with increased odds of ASD ( p = 0.041, adjusted OR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.24–0.99).
While the fraction of false negative results among all of the LumiraDxTM tests compared with real time RT-PCR was not significantly associated with gender ( p = 0.704), a moderately significant difference among the various age groups (0–39 vs. 60–79; p = 0.048) was registered.
Although analyses stratified by sex showed no difference for males ( F (1.81, 45.284) = 1.83, p = 0.17), a borderline significant difference was found for females ( F (3.01,168.578) = 2.67, p = 0.049).
borderline significancep = 0.049
On the other hand, there was a borderline significance ( p = 0.049) in the AFB1 levels between rice brands with FSMC and those without FSMC or with missing information about FSMC ( p = 0.049).
Land use access (C) reached marginal significance ( p = 0.049), while the remaining subscales did not differ between groups. 3.2.
Borderline significant results were obtained for MnSOD ( p = 0.049), COMT ( p = 0.084), NQO1 ( p = 0.065) and DNA Adducts ( p = 0.068).
borderline significancep = 0.04994
A borderline significance was found for the correlation between MPH side effects and the G allele of COMT (rs4680) ( p = 0.04994) in all ADHD children.
Adding disability did not significantly add to the prediction of perspectives on DL ( F (2, 338) = 1.88, ns), whereas entering self-image accounted for an additional marginally significant 1.8% of the variance in students’ perspectives on DL ( F (3, 337) = 3.11, p = 0.05, F -change = 5.53, p < 0.05).
approached significancep = 0.05
The association between parent-specific WBT and greater depressive symptoms approached significance (F(1,116) = 3.85, p = 0.05).
of borderline significancep = 0.05
The association between gender and ERI at t 2 was of borderline significance ( p = 0.05) in the bivariate analysis, which was mainly due to the higher percentage in the upper ERI-tertile (high stress level) in women at t 2 . 3.3.
The direct relation between spirituality and instrumental cyberaggression is only significant for the college sample (β = −0.05, p < 0.001), and between spirituality and reactive cyberaggression is significant for the college sample (β = −0.05, p < 0.001) and almost significant for middle school and high school samples (β = −0.22, p = 0.05; β = 0.07, p = 0.06).
approached significancep = 0.050
SFAL-WP and SFAL-RB Coverage In the SFAL-WP and SFAL-RB model ( Table 2 , Model 4), the interaction term for tax and poverty approached significance (Coeff = 0.02, 95% CI: −0.00, 0.04; p = 0.050), suggesting that the relationship between tax and smoking may differ by poverty.
of borderline significancep = 0.050
Tax by poverty was of borderline significance in this model (Coeff = 0.02, 95% CI: −0.00, 0.04, p = 0.050).
Regarding survey factors, the 3rd survey (2019) showed a marginally significant increase in the likelihood of being highly annoyed compared to the 1st survey ( p ≤ 0.05), while the 4th survey (2023) did not show a statistically significant difference.
When comparing the three observations performed for item 3.5 (Students/resolution strategies), a slightly significant value was found ( p < 0.05), accompanied by a moderate–high effect size (11.5%), which leads us to conclude that there were changes between observations.
Furthermore, Discomfort was marginally significant ( p > 0.05), which meant that girls felt more comfortable than boys during their social performance.
However, a statistically significant relationship was found between average grade from practical training from all three years of the study and competences in the area of student–teacher relationship (r = −0.245, p = 0.044), while on the threshold of significance with student’s belonging to the group (r = −0.239, p = 0.050).
There was no significant difference between the four groups in the baseline condition of Schober’s test before the training programmes ( p = 0.358) and the difference was borderline significant between the four groups ( p = 0.050) after the training period.
Employment in Model 1 changed from marginally significant to significant at p < 0.05 ( p = 0.049).
showed a trendp > 0.05
Low-frequency dominant fatigue before the training showed a trend toward high-frequency dominant fatigue after the training ( p > 0.05).
borderline significancep = 0.05
In this same model, census tracts composed of a high percentage (>50%) of lower-middle class residents ($22,500–$55,000 household income) had more TRI facilities than more affluent tracts (borderline significance p = 0.05).