Excerpts

Despite many of these variables–especially poverty and income inequality–being frequently discussed as determinants of crime [20] , [21] , only belief in God had a significant effect on average crime rates over and above the effects of belief in heaven and hell, which remained highly significant (both p s <.001).

Although the results did not reach statistical significance by Mantel-Cox test, there is a clear trend indicating that high miR-337-3p levels and low STAT3 levels are correlated with increased overall survival.

In contrast, our results showed the markedly localized effect of isotopic enrichment by birds on Bagaud Island, where highly significant differences in isotopic nitrogen values were recorded in areas only 50–200 m apart ( e.g ., plants ∼8‰, Fig. 2 ).

Although waste recycling shows a positive trend, Germany’s total volume of plastics remains comparatively high.

Average income was highly significant when geography was excluded from the model.

However, we found some biologically plausible associations that approached significance in our study.

For fasting insulin we identified 13 markers where the CNV effect showed a trend toward significance ( P CNV ≤9*10 −4 ).

Overall, the branch model results, which only allow for a constant ω parameter across sites, suggest a weak trend where evolutionary rates might be elevated in USP/RXR along the Mecopterida lineage.

Focusing on the models for the estrogen-positive and estrogen-negative subsamples the essential finding for the Uppsala cohort is that proliferation and stromal-decorin are independently prognostic for estrogen-positive tumors, but not for estrogen-negative ones, whereas stromal-laminin is either significant or marginally significant for the estrogen-negative subpopulation.

Highly significant interactions including L. amnionii , G. vaginalis , A. vaginae , Megasphaera sp. type 1 and BVAB1 are displayed in Figure 5 .

In the colchicine group, a moderate but highly significant drop in axonal transport capacity was detected ( Fig. 4 ).

A large number of weakly associated SNPs could result in a highly significant segment-wise association while each individual SNP would fail to survive multiple testing correction.

An association test was performed for each SNP and the number of nominally significant tests in a segment was counted.

However, there was a strong trend toward cricket frogs preferring unmown habitat vs. mown habitat.

The activation of endogenous TG2 with DTT caused a highly significant inward remodeling, which was almost completely prevented by L682777 ( Figure 2C ).

Values of *p<0.05 were considered significant, **p<0.01 very significant and *** p<0.001 extremely significant.

Interestingly, a highly significant negative correlation was found between the level of lactobacilli in the cecal content and the atrophy marker expression in the gastrocnemius muscle (Atrogin-1, MurF1, LC3 and Cathepsin L) ( Figure S3 ).

Estimation of Ki-67-positive (S-phase) cells revealed a highly significant reduction of the percentage of Ki67-positive cells per unit area 3 days after IR, as compared to control and the more advanced time points ( Fig. 4G ).

However, although not statistically significant, the PB adherent cells showed a trend toward higher HMGB1 expression compared to non-adherent cells.

It is striking that the robustly defined (Tan) schizophrenia module was significantly enriched with nominally significant SNPs from a GWAS study.

In these models, psychological distress [Model 5: OR (95% CI) = 1.11 (1.02–1.21)] and physical activity [Model 6: OR (95% CI) = 0.85 (0.77–0.94)] were the only significant covariates, with borderline significant estimates for fruit consumption [Model 6: OR (95% CI) = 0.90 (0.81–1.01)] and socioeconomic disadvantage [Model 7: OR (95% CI) = 1.39 (0.99–1.96)].

Nominally significant effects on insulin sensitivity could be found for MADD and PROX1 .

(P<0.01, very significant, **; P<0.001, extremely significant, ***).

“*” means a value of P<0.01 was considered statistically highly significant.

The most marked effect was the highly significant trial*treatment interaction, in which Littorina-Gibbula trials showed a marked species difference; Littorina showed a reduction in foraging behavior compared to controls whereas Gibbula increased foraging time relative to the control (GLM repeated measures: within factors Trial*Treatment, F 2,27 = 24.918, p<0.0001; between factors Treatment F 2,27 = 6.055, p<0.007).