Excerpts

When the second year was included, the results were slightly significant as a whole (acrosome integrity: P = 0.047; morphology: P = 0.050), but not between any treatment from the first collection year and the 7% glycerol with centrifugation treatment of the second year, except the 5% glycerol with quail egg yolk treatment for morphology (see Supplementary material, table S3 ).

Despite the large sample size, neither association is highly significant (P = 0.047 and 0.02 respectively) and the P-values have not been adjusted for multiple hypothesis testing.

violacea displaying a marginally significant negative trend (slope = −5.630, R 2 = 0.079, p = 0.047).

In particular, at 3 hfd, the difference between the totalPER scores of the memory and control groups yielded a marginal significance for the first 10 trials (F (1, 72) = 4.07, p<.047, η 2 = .05).

Post hoc comparison with the Games-Howell test between the NC and BPD groups yielded a significant p value of 0.014 (Cohen’s d = 1.08), however, the difference between the BPD and the ASC group was only marginally significant (p = 0.047; Cohen’s d = 0.51).

While the Gag/Pol responses did show a significant trend ( p = 0.047; χ 2 trend test) towards a higher positive rate with increasing dose of vaccine ( Table 2 ), these data should be viewed with caution given the low overall rate of Gag/Pol CTL responses.

Three-way repeated measures ANOVA of Valence by Arousal by Hemisphere on P2b latencies ( Table 3 ) revealed a marginally significant main effect of Arousal ( F (1, 20) = 4.50, p = .047, η 2 p = .18), and a three-way interaction of Valence, Arousal, and Hemisphere ( F (1, 20) = 4.45, p = .048, η 2 p = .18), such that the latencies for high arousing negative pictures were shorter than those for low arousing negative pictures over the left hemisphere.

4A 1 ), and OP4 (p<0.001) (data shown only for the OP3 component), though OP2 showed a marginally significant interaction effect (p = 0.047).

On the one hand, the univariate model revealed a positive prognostic effect of borderline significance for CD13 expression in endothelial cells and vessel-associated stroma cells (p = 0.047; log rank test) for patients with squamous cell carcinoma histology.

Exploratory paired t-tests also revealed marginally significant reductions in negative affect [ t( 34) = 2.06, p = .047, d = 0.35] and boredom [ t( 34) = 2.24, p = .032, d = 0.38] from baseline to intervention.

Results When comparing if measures of cortical thickness differed depending on acquisition site, a borderline significant difference was found for right mOFC thickness values (t = -2.090, p = 0.047).

In multivariable-adjusted analyses ( table 3 ), VIM was not associated with the risk of any endpoint (p≥0.058), except for a borderline significant but inverse association with the risk of cardiac endpoints in a model not including SBP (p = 0.047).

After stratifying ACAG into three tertiles, we observed a dose-response relationship: compared to the reference group (T1, 4.75–14.25), the second tertile (T2, 14.25–18.05) showed a marginally significant increased mortality risk (HR: 1.78, 95% CI: 1.01–3.14, p = 0.0473), while the highest tertile (T3, 18.10–41.50) exhibited a substantially higher mortality risk (HR: 2.17, 95% CI: 1.26–3.77, p = 0.0056).

For both groups combined, there was a barely significant difference in the frequencies of mounting direction (chi square = 3.93, p = 0.0474).

However, the predictive strength of the laboratory findings was only expressed as linear correlation and not in line with full Prentice requirements [ 9 ], and appeared to be weak and of borderline significance (r = 0.5811, p = 0.0475), only.

The opsonophagocytosis assay shows marginal significance (p = 0.0476) and a modest biological effect.

In contrast BSO has no effect on ATO-induced apoptosis at 2 μM and is marginally significant at 4 μM (p = 0.0479) in the ATO-resistant line.

The effect was however, only marginally significant for the proportion of calf slaughter (P = 0.048) and not significant for calf body mass (P = 0.066).

The P -value for the pharmacogenetic effect was marginally significant ( P = 0.048).

The difference between the model including significant risk factors and the model including significant risk factors and A-DUI-IAT scores, however, was marginally significant, χ 2 = 3.92, p = .048 (see Table 5 ).

In addition, apart from a borderline significant increase ( p = 0.048) in mean hepatic blood flow, no significant anti-VEGF-induced differences were observed ( p >0.05) in two additional physiological parameters, interstitial fluid volume and the organ blood flow rate, measured using indium-111-pentetate and rubidium-86 chloride, respectively.

The MK/S test was marginally statistically significant (p<0.048), but the results indicated that scores trended downwards only minimally (-0.002 slope coefficient).

Weight loss from baseline was greater in the vaccine than placebo group, evident beginning at Ch+2 and marginally significant across the full study period (% weight loss p = 0.048; absolute loss p = 0.06) ( Figure 3A ).

A borderline significance was noted in developing MACE in younger patients (aged 45–64 years; adjusted HR 1.12; 95% CI 1.00–1.26; p = 0.048).

However, in some of the models the predictor “MRI centre” achieved borderline significance (p = 0.048–0.050).