Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantP < 0.051.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Interestingly, however, pairwise Φ ST values from eight populations exclusively north or south of the Changjiang River (Suzaki [SU; 4 (location code)], Pohang-si [PH; 14], Qingdao [QD; 19], Rizhao [RZ; 20], Zhoushan [ZS; 23], Wenzhou [WZ; 24], Shenzhen [SZ; 27] and Haikou [HK; 29]) were small, but statistically highly significant ( P < 0.05) ( Table 3 ).
approached significanceP < 0.051.0× alpha
Genetic distance measures were higher among sites within the western group than among sites within the eastern group, and permutation tests approached significance at the P < 0.05 level ( F ST : West: 0.023, East: 0.002, P = 0.0610; G” ST : West: 0.220, East: 0.016, P = 0.057; Jost’s D: West: 0.202, East: 0.014, P = 0.057).
nominally significantp<0.051.0× alphagold
More specifically, the 34 selected variants from MelGene were distinguished in two groups: 1) all variants associated with melanoma at a level of p<0.05 following meta-analysis of relevant data from at least 3 independent case-control datasets (28 variants) and 2) additional biologically plausible variants representing potential causal pathways and selected from GWAS (3 variants) and candidate gene studies (3 variants) with genome-wide (p<10 −7 ) or nominally significant (p<0.05) associations.
an increasing trendP > 0.051.0× alphagold
did not reach statistical significanceP > 0.051.0× alphaplainly factual
The results of subgroup analysis are shown in S3 Fig in S1 File : in subgroups such as mechanical ventilation, continuous renal replacement therapy, hypertension, diabetes, vasopressors, INR, and fresh frozen plasma, the mortality risk of the rapidly ascending RDW group (Traj1) was significantly higher than that of the stable low-level group (Traj0) ( P < 0.05); while in subgroups such as age, chronic kidney disease, and Hb, although the mortality risk of the Traj1 group showed an increasing trend, the difference in some subgroups did not reach statistical significance ( P > 0.05), which may be related to the limited statistical power of smaller subgroups and residual confounding.
highly significantp < 0.051.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Variance components estimates of combining ability Combined analysis across the N inputs and seasons revealed that the variance components of general combining ability (GCA) and specific combining ability (SCA) were highly significant (p < 0.05) for all traits ( Table 3 ).
The results indicated that the correlation between responses to the anticipation question and responses to the disappointment question was marginally statistically significant (r s = 0.26, p = .050, N = 59). 3.2 Experiment 2 We first excluded one participant who did not answer all test questions, and confirmed that no participants failed to respond correctly (i.e. “Paris”) to the attention check question.