Excerpts

Please rephrase L274 add “only” before the vastus medialis L289 why the result on the Fz site is considered as “marginally significant trend” (p=0.05), whereas in the previous paragraph the result of RMS in BF was not (p=0.05)? ********** what does this mean? ).

Looking at the model in which different trajectories predict scores (model C), when compared to the low symptom trajectory pupils with increasing trajectories demonstrated significant or nearly significant negative co-efficients of change in attainment (increasing low-moderate β = −.05, p<.05, ES = .07; increasing low-high β = −.18, p<.10, ES = .20).

Yolk height, thick albumen height, and haugh units were unaffected by the treatment, while thin albumen height showed a trend towards reduction in the PRSE group at weeks 47 and 49 (P = 0.05).

Although microarray and qRT-PCR both found that Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 5 ( IGFBP5 ) showed lower expression at labour, this did not reach statistical significance at P = 0.05 according to qRT-PCR.

Marginally significant differences (p = 0.05) were observed between male cases and controls (217.52 vs. 298.17, respectively) but not within females ( Fig 1 ).

In addition, the LAARP approach had less postoperative complications compared with PSARP, with a marginally significant difference (RR 0.66, 95%CI 0.44–0.99; P = 0.05).

The interaction between size and material for LF1 st was, however, marginally significant (F(1,27) = 4.15, p = .05, partial eta 2 = .13), indicating a degree of non-independence in the way that size and material properties influence our lifting forces.

Meanwhile, when covariates were included, 7,350 genes were nominally significant (p < 0.05), and 5,532 genes remained significant after multiple comparison correction (padj < 0.05).

A correlation analysis between slope and temperature did not show a significant trend in slope as a function of temperature (r = 0.73, P>0.05).

Additionally, a few more channels that showed a trend-level difference (uncorrected p<0.05 but not remaining significant after FDR correction) were located approximately in the bilateral frontopolar ([FP]), dorsolateral ([DL]) and ventrolateral ([VL]) regions (uncorrected p<0.01; [FP] ch 36 (d = 0.83; 95%IC 0.19, 1.43), ch47 (d = 0.93; 95%IC 0.26,1.56

There was a borderline significant association between getting biological treatment and having erosions (OR = 3.61, 95% CI: 1.04–14.45, p = 0.050) and a significant association between biological treatment and having moderate/severe DAS28-CRP (OR = 35.83, 95% CI: 10.18–164.94, p < 0.001).

Higher plasma BDNF levels are associated with slower change in white matter volume with age ( Table 2 ) A significant BDNF by sex interaction was observed for the trajectories of frontal WM volume (F(1,360) = 7.52, p = 0.006; Table 1 ), where a strong but marginally significant trend was present for slower rates of frontal WM decline in association with higher BDNF levels in females (p = 0.05).

The GLM analysis with three different response models (by varying the HRF peak latency with 3s increments) yielded almost entirely distinctive activation maps ( Fig 2B ), each of which was only marginally significant ( p <0.05, uncorrected).

When comparing AT and UC groups at 9-month follow-up, the mean difference was approaching significance, -1.05m/sec (95%CI -2.11 to 0.017, p = 0.05).

Highly significant downregulation ( P <0.05) of JAG1 was observed in a total of ten MRKHS patients (62.5%), while DLL1 expression was significantly deregulated in all patients (100%).

Multivariable-adjusted GLM demonstrated a significant trend between individual dyslipidemia components and serum uric acid levels (P < 0.05).

Out of 576 possible specifications, 192 comprised more than a single study, yielding 135 (70.4%) nominally significant ( p < .05) negative summary effects.

Kruskal-Wallis tests comparing alpha diversity across sites were not significant for Shannon (Kruskal-Wallis p = 0.2) or Faith’s PD (Kruskal-Wallis p = 0.1), however, evenness was marginally significant (Kruskal-Wallis p = 0.05), with TN showing significantly higher diversity than YI (post-hoc Dunn’s test p = 0.03) ( Fig 5 and Table B in S1 Dataset ).

In addition, performing tests on false positive and negative warnings using a slope F test based on the AICC (alertogram), shows that two years before the local minimum in 1987 was reached, the negative decrease towards a break becomes highly significant (p<<0.05) in terms of the estimated slopes ( Figure 5C ).

In five studies with low-priority scale, the results showed that the sexual function of the participants in the nursing intervention group was better than that in the control group, and the differences were very close to statistical significance (SMD = −0.72, 95% CI = [−1.43–−0.00], P = 0.05) ( Fig 4B ). 3.4.2.

The differences in sucrose contents between WT, pBI and AtbZIP53-ox lines were highly significant as calculated by Students t -test (* P <0.05; ** P <0.01).

Similarly, in the positive word condition beta values in the right dorsal MPFC were significantly higher in the LLS group than in the HLS group (t 38 = 2.15, p < 0.05), whereas in the negative word condition they were higher on a marginal significance in the HLS group than in the LLS group (t 38 = 2.01, p = 0.05).

CPR changes were positively correlated with HC z-score with borderline significance (r s = 0.21, p = 0.050) in week 30 but not week 36.

There was a marginally significant difference for composite endpoint HIV/AIDS related event or death or WHO Stage II/III (HR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.42, 1.01, p-value = 0.05).

We did not observe a significant trend for a lower risk of physician-diagnosed inhalant allergy when introduced to a higher number of allergenic foods at age ≤6 months (p = 0.05).