Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

close to significancep = .0541.1× alpha
In the blindfolded sighted controls, the effect of scaling factor was close to significance, F (4, 124) = 2.40, p = .054, η p 2 = .07, and was best explained by a quadratic function F (1, 62) = 4.74, p = .033, η p 2 = .07. 3.2.3 Absolute errors There were no significant effects in the analysis with absolute errors (all p s > .24; see Table 8 ).
approaching significancep = .0541.1× alphagold
Of the 10 random subsamples, all produced a trend in the correct direction (i.e., all still had Australian observers showing CFMT-Australian greater than CFMT-Harvard), but only 4 runs produced a significant interaction (range p = .016 to p = .025), 4 runs produced an interaction approaching significance (range p = .054 to p = .093), and 2 produced very small effects (p = .121, p = .418).
showed a trendP = 0.0541.1× alpha
However, the colocalization of GnRH and vGluT2 punta density only showed a trend for a decrease (P = 0.054) that, together with the different ages at which GnRH (young to old) and vGluT2 (young to MA) decreased, suggests that the age-related decline of vGluT2 in the median eminence was probably not associated specifically with the GnRH system.