Excerpts

HCC had a lower ADC than benign lesions, with a suggestive trend (p = 0.06).

Effects of age and treatments on fasting plasma insulin, HOMA-IR and RMR A nearly significant effect of treatment on fasting insulin was revealed (dF = 2/26, F = 3.141, p = 0.06), while no significant effect of age was found (dF = 1/26, F = 1.722, p = 0.201), nor was a crossed effect found (dF = 2/26, F = 1.856, p = 0.176) ( Table 1 ).

2B, 2D ) where there was no surgical injury, but with borderline significance at sites of carotid cuff compression injury (N = 11, p = 0.06, Fig. 2E ), when compared to saline ( Fig. 2A, 2D ).

Patients with Wnt-5a-expressing tumors had a favorable prognosis of borderline significance (HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.54–1.02, p = 0.06 ( Table 2 ).

The correlation was positive, but weak and borderline significant, in never smokers (Spearman r = 0.07, p = 0.06).

Prevalence of chronic kidney disease was lower in Latinx patients (15.0%) compared with Black patients (36.7%) and White patients (27.6%), this difference approached but did not reach significance[ P = 0.060].

Line 406 p = .054 is defined as marginally significant; Line 419 p =.06 is defined as non-significant. 12.

Although the majority of all three conditions were in Cluster 1, a larger percentage of people from the gratitude experience (63.46%) and gratitude letter (78.79%) conditions were in Cluster 1 than from the near-miss relief condition (53.06%), yielding a marginally significant chi-square test, χ 2 (2) = 5.63, p = .06.

Species richness of Lamiinae was unaffected by trap height or trap color in GA ( Fig 5A ) but effects of trap height were significant in JI ( Fig 5B ) and PO ( Fig 5D ) and nearly significant ( P = 0.06) in NB (Fig 5C), with greater mean captures in canopy traps vs . understory traps ( Table S4 ).

However, correlation between nitrate and ( nirS + nirK )/( nosZ I + nosZ II ) was only weakly significant (p = 0.06) ( Table 3 ).

Ethanol treatment increased locomotor activity (two-way ANOVA: effect of treatment, F (1,36) = 4.67, p <0.05; Figure 6B ) and total arm entries in both groups, although the latter measure did not quite reach statistical significance ( p = 0.06; Figure 6C ).

Almost every time point of accumulation (impactful events by 1 year, 3 years, 4 years, and 5 years) was significantly associated with child anxiety symptoms at 5 years; impactful events that were accumulated by year 2 had a similar effect size ( r = 0.095) but only approached significance ( p = 0.060).

A nearly significant value differentiates the Terrestrial from the Semi-Aquatic ecogroup (p = 0.06, Table 1 ).

Again, we see some evidence that the effect of the economic information was strongest among those who thought their job was at least at some risk due to the pandemic (−0.18, p = .002) compared to those who believed there was no risk to their job (−0.03, p = .588), though the interaction term isn’t quite significant at conventional levels (p = .060).

This association persisted with borderline significance amongst individuals with a high PCWP, odds ratio (95% CI) 2.72 (0.96–7.68, p = 0.06), but not in those with a low PCWP.

There was a borderline significant reduction in plasma concentrations of tau between gestational week 10 and 37 (p = 0.06).

Furthermore, LOOCV test demonstrated only borderline significance (p = .06) for the positive correlation between Ki-67 labeling index and nTBV, even though the p-value was 0.01 for their correlation on Pearson correlation analysis.

Up284 significantly reduced tumor burden (p = 0.002) and showed a trend for prolonged survival compared to vehicle treated group (p = 0.06) ( Fig 6D–6F ).

Interaction between both factors approached significance (p = 0.06).

This difference was statistically marginally significant (P = 0.06).

On the contrary, the comparison between late deaf CI recipients and their matched controls revealed a significant main effect of Condition (F(1.5, 27.8) = 50.6, p<0.001, effect size η p 2 = 0.3) but only a marginally significant interaction between Condition and Group (F(1.5, 27.8) = 3.3, p = 0.06, effect size η p 2 = 0.2).

Similarly, the association between group and change in LDL cholesterol approached significance after accounting for the influence of BMI change ( p = .06; Table 6 , top panel; Fig 3 ).

In cohort-2, DFS and BCSS was borderline significant (DFS: log rank = 0.06, BCSS: log rank p = 0.06; S3 Fig ), while in TCGA there was no association ( S3 Fig ).

The GWAS study in China, using 498 patients and 2025 controls from the Han Chinese population, revealed borderline significance (p = 0.06) for the SNP rs3918347 [ 48 ], which is 890 bp from our SNP rs55944529.

For the N1 and CNV amplitudes ( Table 3 ; Fig 5 ), although there was no significant main effect of condition on the N1 ( F (2,52) = 2.09, p = 0.13, ƞ 2 = 0.074), there was a significant difference in the amplitude between the Neut→Neut condition and the Neg→Neut condition ( W = 101.00, p = 0.03, r rb = -0.466) and a marginally significant difference between Neut→Neut and Neut→Neg ( W = 111.00, p = 0.06, r rb = -0.466).