The difference between conditions in attributing ethnic stereotypes to environmental causes was marginally significant, F(2, 1157) = 2.82, p = .060, η 2 = .005.
Excerpts
There was a main effect of neuron type (P<.03) but no effect of stimulus (P>0.1) and the interaction just missed significance (P=.06), suggesting that the propensity to burst is more strongly influenced by neuron type than stimulus quality, although both factors may contribute.
Due to the low number of cases, group differences were marginally significant in 2004 (χ 2 (2) = 3.53; p = 0.06) and were significant in 2018 (χ 2 (2) = 8.44; p<0.01).
When considering single emotions, a significant positive correlation between recognition and expressivity scores was revealed only for surprise (r = 0.55, p = 0.01) in the PD group and a tendency toward statistical significance was also observed for disgust (r = 0.4, p = 0.06) for the same group.
WNV was detected only in swabs obtained from birds in the 10 7 and 10 5 challenge groups, (5/8, 63%, CI 30–87%, and 2/13,15%, CI 2–39%, respectively) ( Table 1 ), a difference in proportions that was only marginally significant (Fisher’s Exact test p = 0.06), but WNV was shed orally in significantly more birds of the 10 7 group as compared to the 10 3 group (Fisher’s exact test, p = 0.009).
showed a trendp = 0.06
OSR2 mRNA overexpression (≥ median) showed a trend towards lower DFS rates (HR [CI] 4.54 [0.93; 22.16]; p = 0.06) and predicted significantly worse OS rates (HR [CI] 6.25 [1.37; 28.38]; p = 0.018).
marginally non-significantP = 0.06
Mean torpor frequency (i.e., percentage of days on which torpor was used) was 58.3 ± 18.1% (N = 122 bouts) in the deep shade treatment, 54.8 ± 20.3% (N = 124 bouts) in the partial shade treatment, and 27.8 ± 28.1% (N = 51 bouts) in the full sun treatment, with variation among the three treatments being marginally non-significant (LMM, F 1, 16 = 3.98, P = 0.06).
sH1N1 FluoroSpot revealed no significant changes in IFNγ SFCs after either dose of vaccine ( Fig 3C ), but exhibited a marginally significant increase in GrB SFCs post-dose 1 (p = 0.06; Fig 3D ).
marginally non-significantp = 0.06
However, there was a marginally non-significant negative relationship between RMR and Age (-0.12 ± 0.06, t = 1.91, p = 0.06); Age was therefore kept in the main analysis with personality.
of borderline significancep-values = 0.06
The other two categories were of borderline significance (p-values = 0.06 and 0.07).
showed a trendp = 0.06
Years from initial diagnosis showed a trend to being fewer in those with moderate versus mild impairment (26 v 23 years, p = 0.06).
There was a strong trend toward reduced basal MSNA following caloric restriction alone (normcaloric vs. hypocaloric: 22±3 vs. 14±4 burst/min, p = 0.06).
The binding of all of the ligands to BCA resulted in a trend to fewer exchanged BCA hydrogens relative to the case when BCA alone was incubated in D 2 O; this decrease was statistically significant ( p <0.05) for SA-OH, SA-Gly 1 , SA-Gly 3 , and SA-Gly 4 and at the edge of significance ( p = 0.06) for SA-Gly 2 and SA-Gly 5 .
Relationship between insulin sensitivity and secretion: role of carbohydrate oxidation Insulin sensitivity was not associated with carbohydrate oxidation during the whole test (r = 0.07; p = 0.65) nor after the first glucose loading (r = 0.07; p = 0.65), while over the second postprandial period reached borderline significance (r = -0.27; p = 0.06).
barely missed significancep = 0.06
The 63% inhibition by the 0.4 mg/kg LY3304000 and 10 mg/kg LY3358966 in combination exceeded the inhibition by either compound alone, though it barely missed significance compared to 10 mg/kg LY3358966 (p = 0.06).
close to significancep = 0.06
Positive significant associations were observed in all centers except Malmo (Sweden) were a positive association close to significance was observed (β (95% CI) = 127 (−3,257), p = 0.06).
marginally non-significantp = 0.06
However, in colony pairs 4 and 5, controls were less aggressive; this difference was significant in colony pair 4 (GLM: t 40 = 2.02, p = 0.04) and marginally non-significant in pair 5 (GLM: t 26 = 1.96, p = 0.06).
Additionally, maternal pre-pregnancy underweight seemed to have a rather strong inverse association with asthma related hospitalization in males and, though only borderline significant (P = 0.06), it seemed that feeding method affected the risk of hospital in males, while not at all having an effect on females.
Both WT and Tph1 (−/−) mice were able to learn the association between the stimulus light and reward (session effect: F (12,493) = 93.385; P<0.001) however there was a strong trend indicating that aged Tph1 (−/−) mice may acquire this association slower (age×genotype: F (36, 493) = 1.398; P = 0.06; Figure 3A ).
There was also a marginally significant effect of session [F(1,36) = 3.80; p = .06; η p 2 = .096], showing that interpersonal distance was larger before (2175 mm) than after (2022 mm) the social interaction.
The interaction between the ISI and Group factors tended towards significance (F(1,18) = 4.2, p<0.06).
Later enzymatic factors Glut4 and Fasn also fail to be upregulated in the Tmem120A/B double knockdown cell line ( Fig 5B , p = 3.2e-08 and 7.5e-04 respectively) and Adipoq narrowly missed statistical significance (p = 0.06).
After adjusting for FLIPI-1 scores and gender in multivariate Cox proportional hazards modeling ( Table 2 ), low SMD showed a strong trend towards poorer PFS (HR 1.65, 95% CI 0.98–2.79, p = 0.06, see Fig 1 ).
Results were marginally significant for acceptance ( F 1,93 = 2.59; p = .06; partial η 2 = .05) and non-significant for glycated hemoglobin ( F 1,93 = 0.54; p = .58; partial η 2 = .01).
But the searching slope for Chinese subjects was steeper than that for Black subjects, with a marginally significant interaction of Set size and Race of participant, F (2, 82) = 2.93, p = .06, η p 2 = .07.