Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

barely significantp = 0.0601.2× alphagold
Given this, 31.1% of the respondents are considering using the project data for research purposes and 33.0% consider MIPP/InNat data as a useful tool to identify suitable sites where they may observe or photograph the target species (instrumental interest) with a barely significant difference between classes, respectively 27.7% for CV and 34.8% for NCV (X 2 = 7.40; p = 0.060) and a weak association between classes and instrumental interest (Tau-b = 0.120; p = 0.013).
showed a trendp = 0.061.2× alpha
Efficacy of 1 st line and 2 nd line TKI treatments Median PFS on first-line erlotinib or gefitinib TKI treatment in those who turned out to be T790M positive (n = 22) and negative (n = 7) in later biopsies showed a trend to be different, 13.3 months (95% CI., 10–17) and 8.1 months (95% CI., 0–16) respectively (p = 0.06; Fig 1 ).
Similar to miR-149, miR-202 expression at baseline was lowest in the ozone + in vivo LPS group, with exposure-dependent effects that were near statistical significance ( Figure 5B ; two-way ANOVA for in vivo exposure and in vitro LPS treatment; p = 0.06 for exposure and p = 0.04 for LPS). miR-202 decreased with in vitro LPS treatment compared to baseline values except in cultures with a history of ozone exposure ( p = 0.06 for ozone alone, p = 0.002 for ozone + in vivo LPS).
quite significantp = .0601.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Again, we see some evidence that the effect of the economic information was strongest among those who thought their job was at least at some risk due to the pandemic (−0.18, p = .002) compared to those who believed there was no risk to their job (−0.03, p = .588), though the interaction term isn’t quite significant at conventional levels (p = .060).
marginally significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
Parent specific effects were not found in our sample, a GLM including parent (father/mother) as additional factor did not show a significant effect for parent , ( F (1,45) = 0.099, p = 0.75), while the main effect group and the interaction effect group × parenting style remained unchanged; the marginally significant main effect parenting style was not significant anymore, p = 0.06, due to model complexity.
only marginally significantp = .061.2× alphagold
This relationship was only marginally significant in the low-status/individualistic norm condition, B = 0.18, t (148) = 1.86, p = .06, 95% CI [-0.01, 0.37], and was not significant in both the high-status/collectivistic norm condition, B = -0.08, t (148) = -0.76, p = .45, 95% CI [-0.28, 0.13], and the high-status/individualistic norm condition, B = 0.14, t (148) = 1.30, p = .20, 95% CI [-0.07, 0.36].