Excerpts

sH1N1 FluoroSpot revealed no significant changes in IFNγ SFCs after either dose of vaccine ( Fig 3C ), but exhibited a marginally significant increase in GrB SFCs post-dose 1 (p = 0.06; Fig 3D ).

Although this region did not survive the multiple comparisons analysis, it is reported for two reasons: first, due to the hypothesis concerning TPJ involvement in future prediction (see the Introduction ); second, the p value of this region after correction was close to significance ( p = 0.06).

This relationship was marginally significant for those in racially homogeneous schools, r s (39) = .26, p = .06, but non-significant for those in racially heterogeneous schools, r s (29) = .16, p = .20.

In the subgroup for which computed tomography data were available, nonfasting glucose levels were lower in the offspring group as compared to the control subjects, although this difference was only borderline significant (5.7 and 6.0 mmol/L for offspring of long-lived siblings and partners respectively, p = 0.06).

Only the specialized chest radiologist clearly approached the diagnostic performance of the CT model (p = 0.79), while a clear trend was seen for the other, less experienced observer (p = 0.06).

Although not quite significant (p = 0.06), cricket-fed spiders had the lowest MiSp relative to actin ( Fig 2D ).

FD mice gained 18% more weight with a marginal significance ( p = 0.06) in accordance with a previous study [65] .

the older the patient, the faster onset of symptoms), yet it was not fully significant (coefficient = -0.2, p = 0.06).

In cases where N = 57 (comparison with the AUT and TTCT tests), T-test results sometimes showed a trend p = ~0.1 when the MW test showed significance or trend for significance p<0.06.

The relationship between the number of kangaroo rats per site and SNV prevalence was marginally significant (GLM, coefficient = 0.48, F 1, 39 = 3.86, P = 0.06).

The interaction Task x Emotional valence x Spatial frequency also tended towards significance (F4,48 = 2.73; p = 0.06; η2 = 0.16).

There was a strong trend toward reduced basal MSNA following caloric restriction alone (normcaloric vs. hypocaloric: 22±3 vs. 14±4 burst/min, p = 0.06).

The main within person effect for time outdoors in the morning approached significance in predicting Total Sleep Time ( p = 0.06) after adjusting for time outdoors in the afternoon.

The main effect of color congruency was marginally significant [ F (1, 23) = 3.89, η p 2 = 0.15, p = 0.06].

Efficacy of 1 st line and 2 nd line TKI treatments Median PFS on first-line erlotinib or gefitinib TKI treatment in those who turned out to be T790M positive (n = 22) and negative (n = 7) in later biopsies showed a trend to be different, 13.3 months (95% CI., 10–17) and 8.1 months (95% CI., 0–16) respectively (p = 0.06; Fig 1 ).

The difference between conditions in attributing ethnic stereotypes to environmental causes was marginally significant, F(2, 1157) = 2.82, p = .060, η 2 = .005.

Tennis players showed a trend to greater volume in the non-dominant compared to the dominant gluteal muscles (8%, P = 0.06), whilst similar GL muscles volumes were observed in both sides in SP and CG (P = 0.87 and P = 0.94, respectively) ( Fig. 1B ).

The 3×2×6 mixed ANOVA with between-subjects factors group (learners, non-learners, or controls), and within-subjects factors training run (first run, last run) and BMA parameter (V-SPL, SPL-V, up_V, up_SPL, up_V-SPL, up_SPL-V) revealed a significant main effect of group (F(1,2) = 5.49, p = 0.04), a significant main effect of BMA parameter (F(1,5) = 3.66, p = 0.01), and a strong trend towards significance in the 3-way interaction between group×training run×BMA parameter (F(1,10) = 1.91, p = 0.06).

The HR of handgrip strength for commencing dialysis had marginal significance (P = 0.06) in CKD patients with age of 65 years or less, where adjusted HR was similar in the subgroup of age above 65years.

The effect of prime face reached marginal significance ( F (2, 78) = 2.83, p = .06).

Age showed a trend to an independent prognostic factor as well (p = 0.06): Fig 4 .

Due to the low number of cases, group differences were marginally significant in 2004 (χ 2 (2) = 3.53; p = 0.06) and were significant in 2018 (χ 2 (2) = 8.44; p<0.01).

Similar to miR-149, miR-202 expression at baseline was lowest in the ozone + in vivo LPS group, with exposure-dependent effects that were near statistical significance ( Figure 5B ; two-way ANOVA for in vivo exposure and in vitro LPS treatment; p = 0.06 for exposure and p = 0.04 for LPS). miR-202 decreased with in vitro LPS treatment compared to baseline values except in cultures with a history of ozone exposure ( p = 0.06 for ozone alone, p = 0.002 for ozone + in vivo LPS).

A mixed-design ANOVA with group as a between subject factor (matched picture group and control group) and word type as a within-subject factor (old and new words) revealed a significant main effect of word type, F (1, 30) = 9.53, p <.01, η p 2 = .24, however, the main effect of group was only marginally significant, F (1, 30) = 3.92, p = .06, η p 2 = .12.

Specifically, significant mating biases were found in 12 females (11 females: p<0.001; 1 female: p<0.02), two females showed a trend towards a mating bias (fs11: p = 0.06 and fs04: p = 0.08, respectively), and for only one female matings were distributed randomly across males (B index not significant; fs15: p>0.3).