Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

showed a trendp = 0.061.2× alpha
After adjusting by age, route of HIV infection, length of infection before cART and viral hepatitis coinfection, CCR2 rs1799864-AG genotype was significantly associated with INR status (OR [95% CI]: 1.80 [1.04–3.11]; p = 0.04), and CXCL12 rs1801157-TT genotype showed a trend (OR [95% CI]: 2.47 [0.96–6.35]; p = 0.06).
close to significancep = 0.061.2× alpha
Although this region did not survive the multiple comparisons analysis, it is reported for two reasons: first, due to the hypothesis concerning TPJ involvement in future prediction (see the Introduction ); second, the p value of this region after correction was close to significance ( p = 0.06).
a strong trendp=0.061.2× alphagold
The ANOVA displayed a main effect of group [F(2, 26)=3.61; p=0.04] on shelter seeking behaviour, which according to the post-hoc test was due to the young MS360 rats displaying less shelter seeking behaviour compared to the young AFR rats (p=0.02) and there was a strong trend towards a similar difference in the adult rats (p=0.06), Figure 3e .
borderline significantP = 0.061.2× alphagold
The average PPARGC1A methylation at four CpG sites situated 867-624 bp from the transcription start was associated with whole-body insulin sensitivity in a paradoxical positive manner (β = 0.12, P = 0.03), supported by a borderline significant inverse correlation with fasting insulin levels (β = −0.88, P = 0.06).
near-significantp = .061.2× alphagold
In the 600–900 ms time window, there was a near-significant main effect of condition F (2, 18) = 3.28, MSE = 6.38, p = .06 at midline sites, F (2, 18) = 3.33, MSE = 15.56, p = .06 at lateral sites, but a significant interaction between condition and anteriority, F (6, 54) = 3.29, MSE = 0.47, p < .01 at midline sites, F (12, 108) = 2.46, MSE = 0.73, p < .01 at lateral sites.
not quite significantP = 0.061.2× alphagold
Mean K v current densities at +60 mV, measured approximately 3 minutes following the establishment of whole-cell configurations, were 30.9 ± 3.8 (n = 13) and 21.8 ± 2.2 (n = 10) pA pF -1 in control and in PKAi-RR containing pipette solutions respectively (this difference was not quite significant (P = 0.06), though as stated above current densities were variable in these cells).
Of them, two studies reported PE risk according to upper quartile versus lower quartile of third-trimester plasma TGF-β 1 (OR = 7.2, 95% CI [2.2, 23.8] and OR = 2.5, 95% CI [1.2, 5.6]); In the study reporting the after-delivery plasma TGF-β 1 level [21] , maternal plasma TGF-beta 1 concentrations were higher in cases than in controls, falls just short of standard levels of statistical significance (23.2±1.3 versus 20.3±1.0 ng/ml, p = 0.06; OR = 2.5, 95% CI [1.2, 5.6], upper quartile versus lower quartile).
of borderline significancep = 0.061.2× alpha
When we defined the presence of a BCG scar strictly and excluded those with scar “unknown/not sure” and repeated the Cox regression (N = 4061), BCG scar and QFT were both only of borderline significance, hazard ratios 1.7 (95% CI 0.9–3.2, p = 0.06) and 1.7 (95% CI 1.0–2.9, p = 0.07) respectively while maternal education of primary school or less or unknown remained significant at hazard ratio 1.4 (95% CI 1.0–1.9, p = 0.04).