Excerpts

While domain-general risk attitudes exhibited a significant relationship with risk premiums, the relationship between Investing domain risk attitudes and risk premium was only marginally significant (β = -0.124, p = .088).

cultripes showed a trend towards a decrease in δ 15 N when at high density, although it was marginally non-significant ( Low - High : F 1,81 = 2.98; P = 0.088; Fig 2 ).

Both groups showed a steeper rate of decline compared to no HSME, but results were moderately significant ( B = -0.235, p = 0.088, B = -0.041, p = 0.058).

This finding was statistically significant prior to adjusting for endogenous estrogens (52%, p = 0.031) and marginally significant after adjustment (39%, p = 0.088).

fumigatus positivity in serum samples was highest on Day 3 (16 of 18 positive) and Day 4 (17 of 18 positive) but declined on Day 5 (13 of 18 positive) and Day 7 (12 of 18 positive) with waning of immunosuppression and the difference between Day 4 and Day 7 was nearly statistically significant (p = 0.088).

Our multiple regression analysis shows that age, clinical attachment level, plaque index, and scaling were associated significantly with the PPI, although the gargling frequency was marginally significant (p = 0.088).

However, retention was higher when learning was followed by the ‘bangs only’ delay than by the ‘sounds only’ delay condition, and this difference was near-significant ( t (35) = −1.755, p = .088).

The main effect of time was marginally significant, F(1,688) = 2.91, p = .088, η p 2 < .001 meaning that participants showed marginally less explicit ingroup bias after the election (M = 1.13, SD = 26.29) compared to before the election (M = 3.90, SD = 25.78).

Among analyzed SNPs, only VEGFR2 rs12505758 C- variants, compared to T/T, were associated to shorter PFS (HR: 1.36 [1.05–1.75], p = 0.015, dominant genetic model) and OS, with a trend toward significance (HR: 1.34 [0.95–1.88], p = 0.088).

The results were mostly the same, except that the chi-square analyses for the verbal condition were not significant, χ 2 (2, 116) = 2.68, p = .262, φ = .152, 95% CI [0.45, 0.63], and the binomial test for the contagious confederate in the verbal condition only approached significance, ( p = 0.088).

Rodents with 15% tannin had a marginally significant shorter survival time than treatments with 1% and 5% tannin content ( P = 0.088 and 0.109, respectively).

Not undergoing post-OLT CRRT was also a marginally significant predictor of removal from dialysis (HR = 1.43, 95% CI = 0.95 to 2.14, p = 0.088; Table 3 ).

When the slope ratio was substituted with estimated maximal evoked force, regression analysis revealed a positive trend with MoCA scores (p = 0.088), supporting the hypothesis that greater force-generating capacity may be indicative of more preserved cognitive function.

It is noteworthy that there was also a nearly significant trend for this effect in left PMd (p = 0.088), implying a bilateral representation of the visual movement consequences in that area as well.

Also at the muddy-sand site, OM content was lower in +AS plots than in -AS plots, although the effect was only marginally significant ( p = 0.088 in winter, p = 0.075 in summer).

This did produce a trend towards significance (t = 1.704, p = 0.088).

It was found that the IFOV conditions (F = 17.33, p < 0.001) significantly influenced the BTC, while gender had a marginally significant effect on the BTC (F = 3.044, p = 0.088).

It should be noted that the correlation between genetic distances based on microsatellite data and sampling age ( Figure S1, C ) was marginally significant (p = 0.088) that could contribute to the effect of isolation by distance in the genotype data.

However, only the contribution of Extraversion reached a marginal significance (E: β = −.37, p = .088).

The interaction of group and memory load was marginally significant ( F (2, 80) = 2.51, p = 0.088, η p 2 = 0.06).

The difference among genotypic classes in June approached significance (MANOVA: Pillai-Bartlett = 0.06, Approx F 6,354 = 1.86, P = 0.088), primarily reflecting the influence of genotypic class on leaf C and, to a lesser extent, leaf P ( Table 1 ).

We apply bivariate probit regression to address this unobserved effect and find that the effect of MAOA remains significant for lottery purchase (allele model, p = 0.010, genotype model, p = 0.011) and marginally significant for insurance purchase (allele model, p = 0.088, genotype model, p = 0.088).

A follow-up regression model predicting unique actions from education and proportion of key function play yielded a marginally significant interaction term ( p = .088), so we remain cautious in our interpretation.

1 -D), but the positive relationship between the difference in antibody level between the first and the last egg and FA was marginally significant ( r 2 = 0.17, β ±SE = 10.39±5.72, F 1,16 = 3.30, P = 0.0881).

In the analysis of time alone, the positive linear increase across time became only marginally significant (β = 0.02, p = 0.0884) after adjusting for a significant positive AR1 autocorrelative term (β = 0.8716, p<0.0001; the Durbin-Watson test of lag 1 autocorrelation was significant before adjusting for the AR1, but not after); the autocorrelation term absorbed much of the variance due to the deviation from a straight-line trend.