Excerpts

The difference between group B and group D is significant on day 1 (p <0.05) and nearly significant on day 7 and day 14 (p < 0.1).

Concerning LVM regression, the most important parameter to determine the success of AVR in patients’ outcome, out of the five UPS elements analyzed, MDM2 showed the strongest association (r = -0.44), approaching significance ( p = 0.10).

After incorporating interactions between bone lead and genotypes into the models, we found that 5 and 4 polymorphisms reached statistical significance (p<0.05) and borderline significance (p<0.1), respectively, when genotypes were modeled as additive ( Table 3 ).

Post-hoc simple regression analyses revealed a negative trend for the relationship of the affiliation motive to performance in the power incentive condition ( r = −.30, p = .10).

Factors that demonstrated a moderately significant statistical relationship in the univariate analysis ( P <.1) were entered by forward selection in a multivariate Cox proportional-hazards regression model [22] .

Neither model comparison was found to significantly improve the overall fit, although both showed a trend towards significance (0.05 < p < 0.10).

Both ITT and LATE estimates indicate that a marginally significant (i.e., p < .10) proportion of HSAs and nurses/midwives in the treatment areas compared to those in the control areas reported visiting pregnant women in their catchment areas at least once during their pregnancy.

Sensitivity analyses Calculating PDC for the LDC cohort based on the mean PDC of both substances decreased the effect size of the ATT compared to the original definition, but the results point into the same direction in all years and remained highly significant in years 2 and three (0.02, p>0.10; 0.08, p = 0.006; 0.12, p<0.001).

A backwards-stepwise model building procedure was used: those variables that were statistically significant or approaching significance (P<0.1) in the univariable analysis were included in the multivariable analysis.

Moreover, although the main effect for SVO in the analysis of Security was marginally significant ( p = .10), the mean differences were in the opposite direction to the mean differences in the analysis of Conformity.

Johns who had had STD infections showed a marginally significant level of more condom use ( B = 0.504, p <0.1).

Four sets of Polycomb-regulated genes, which characterize more differentiated cells, were up-regulated in the differentiated subtype when compared to the stem-like subtype and were close to significance (p<0.10).

(e) There was marginally significant difference of CD44T expression according to N factors (p = 0.10), and CD44T expression was rather reduced in N2 factor.

In spite of the 2.1±38.5 percent of decrement in EGCG group and the 18.8±58.3 percent of increment in placebo group, decaffeinated EGCG led to a decreasing trend in serum TG (p<0.1).

In contrast, more boys than girls screened positive for SOR at age seven years although the difference was only marginally significant (60 girls, and 82 boys; OR = 1.2, 95%CI 1.0–1.6, p = .10).

All effects were reported as statistically significant if p ≤ 0.05 and marginally significant if p ≤ 0.10.

However, these intra-annual differences were only marginally significant (P<0.1).

Results based on OLS tended to show negative associations between water-stable aggregates and measures of plant biomass while results based on GLS found a mixture of no appreciable associations, marginally significant (0.05 < P ≤ 0.10), and significant (α = 0.05) negative associations between water-stable aggregates and plant properties.

A marginally significant and negative correlation was found between T 4 and urinary MnBP (R = −0.179; p-value < 0.10).

The Biocultural Identity Index (K) also shows a positive, though marginally significant, impact ( β = 0.015, p < 0.1), suggesting that cultural density supports health outcomes.

In addition, there was a statistical trend towards patients with schizophrenia being more likely to decline examination (p = 0.10) and decline treatment (p = 0.09) compared to PHCs, while being offered examination and being offered treatment both contributed statistically insignificantly to the overall discrepancy between the two patient groups.

However, the odds ratios approached significance for quartiles 1 and 3 (p<0.10).

Meanwhile, the impact of having been unemployed continuously is negative but only marginally significant, with p<0.1.

Subjectively, those with “borderline significance” (p<0.10) were included.

Statistical significance was set at p<0.05; statistical results with p<0.001 were considered highly significant, statistical results with p<0.1 were accepted as a trend.