Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantqualifiedgold
The pooled ANOVA for both locations for the traits namely days to germination (DG), days to flowering initiation (DFI), days to 50% flowering (DFF), days to 100% flowering (DHF), plant height (PH), pods per plant (NPP), biomass (BIO), grain yield (YLD), 100-seed weight (HSW), harvest index (HI), membrane permeability index (MPI), relative leaf water content (RLWC) and pollen viability (PV)) showed a highly significant difference in RILs.
This phenomenon is mainly due to the discomfort of the rats in the expanded group when they first were placed the helix springs, which will affect their normal eating, resulting in a significant trend of weight loss in the first 3 days after the springs is placed: Gradually adapt to the appliance, so from the 4th day, food intake tended to be normal, and the weight increased steadily.
quite significantqualifiedgold
From the conclusion: This is quite significant: “To the best of our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of the costly effects of blame in persuasion efforts, and specifically with regards to raising awareness of animal suffering in factory farming.” A question that arose for me after reading study 1: Are you saying that being blamed for farmed animal suffering won’t make you rationalize meat eating as much as it will make you defend your human superiority over other animals?
highly significantqualifiedgold
In all of the metrics, on all days, with or without feedback, and with both weights, there is a significant difference between the weight change trial and the one preceding it (all p < 0.05), suggesting that the grasp was adapted to the changing weight (the only exception being the peak rate of grasp force during the load phase with feedback when switching from a high to a low weight on day 2 (p = 0.066); but the difference is highly significant on days 1 and 3).
This matched the mean size observed during line transect sampling (1.9 whales, SE = 0.17, CV = 0.09), in which group size appeared to be slightly higher in the central inner channels (Squally Channel mean = 2.04, SE = 0.17, CV = 0.08) than in outer channels (Caamaño Sound mean = 1.86, SE = 0.34, CV = 0.18), though this difference fell short of significance (S6 Table in S1 File ).