Comparison of the achievement rate of DTE < 10 min before and after implementation of the cardiac triage program showed a significant trend of increase after initiation of the strategy ( p = 0.032) (Fig. 3 ).
Excerpts
Additionally, a marginally significant difference was found in the 13–18 years group at the 4-item level ( p = 0.032), with boys having slightly higher BMI.
In contrast, there was a slightly significant increase in the expression of the FAK gene (1.41-fold) in lung tissue of the low-dose PCA-BSA@FA-NPs-treated group compared to the healthy control group ( p = 0.032).
On the multivariate analysis, the G12D/V mutation was associated with a poor prognosis in both cohorts, with marginal significance (HR = 2.015, 95% CI = 1.064–3.817, P = 0.032 in the discovery cohort; HR = 2.366, 95% CI = 1.109–5.046, P = 0.026 in the validation cohort).
rs4766566 had a nominally significant association ( P = 0.032), but did not pass the significant threshold for multiple hypothesis testing ( Table 2 ).
However, when analysing differences due to the experimental treatments by sampling day, although no differences were found during the suckling period, a statistical trend for an increased beta-diversity in the control piglets was found after weaning ( P = 0.033, P = 0.053 and P = 0.058, for Envfit, Anosim and Adonis tests, respectively).
However, that difference was marginally significant (t-test p value = 0.033, but Mann-Whitney p value was 0.44, Fig. 4A ).
After excluding the samples that showed no detectable Mcl-1 expression, a significant difference was apparent between Mcl-1 expression in BM versus PB (p = 0.033).
borderline significancep = 0.033
CIIMaxUC (aspect of mitochondrial function determined by using glucose as the fuel source with FCCP as an uncoupler) related to cold limbs, significantly in the total sample and with borderline significance in VGWI assessed separately: r = − 0.40 ( p = 0.033) and r = − 0.47 ( p = 0.065), respectively.
approached significancep = 0.033
The difference between the 100%-PAPE and control conditions approached significance but did not meet the Bonferroni-corrected threshold ( p = 0.033).
In the current study, all significant comparisons obtained for F ST estimates ranged between 0.00388 and 0.0125, and all near-significant values (for which 0.1 > P > 0.03326, the threshold for significance after SGoF + correction) ranged from 0.00168 to 0.00572.
showed a trendp = 0.0334
Various blood cell types also showed a trend to association with microbial diversity, including eosinophils which strongly associated with beta diversity when measured by Weighted Unifrac ( p = 0.0334) and Unweighted Unifrac ( p = 0.002).
Multivariate model A multivariate model was performed using the factors of near-significance and found to be highly significant ( X 2 = 24.078, p = 0.034, including age and BMI as continuous factors and sex as a time-dependent co-variable, Fig. 2 , Table 5 ).
Additionally, the model fitting results for LDL indicated a decreasing trend in the exposed group compared to the control group, which was also statistically significant (β = -1.76, p = 0.034).
A paired t-test comparing the means of the most visibly different groups, extended G0 and G2, shows only marginal significance (p = 0.034).
For the correlation between the cluster of voxelwise interaction and cognitive tests, although the results failed to survive from the criteria of Bonferroni correction, a positive trend between DSB score and putaminal volume was observed in the participants carrying AA (r = 0.189, P = 0.034).
There was a highly significant interaction between Si and N ( F = 3.171, P = 0.034) in the soil available P concentration.
Matched samples comparisons There were marginally significant differences in RSFC parameters (Table 2 ) for within-network RSFC of the fronto-parietal network (FPN, p = 0.034) and the ratio of within- to inter-network RSFC of the visual network ( p = 0.044; Fig. 2 ) between PRESENT shift workers and MATCHED controls.
The difference was only marginally significant with mycorrhiza helper (R 2 = 0.29, P = 0.034), but no significant difference was detected with the root parasite.
This association remained highly significant after adjusting for smoking (Model 2), yielding an OR of 14.3 (95% CI 2.80–72.8, p = 0.034).
Therefore, we performed further analysis and found that after postoperative day 107, the risk of cumulative ischemic events showed an increasing trend according to the number of CYP2C19 LOF alleles (hazard ratio, 6.176; 95% CI of ratio, 1.145 to 33.32; P = 0.0342; Fig. 1D ).
rs12654812 ( RGS14 ) also revealed a borderline significant difference in its allelic distribution ( p = 0.0346).
Nevertheless, the association between the gr/gr deletions and male infertility in the Mongolian populations was only marginally significant (p-value = 0.035).
Marginally significant correlations during the SAT condition were observed at Optodes 3 and 5 for [HbO] with the PANSS positive subscale (rho = 0.45~0.484, p = 0.035~0.04) but not for other subscales.
showed a trendp = 0.035
DRGs treated with human bevacizumab + FUS (nDRGs = 12; voxel: 98.2 ± 43.7; diameter: 0.86 ± 0.14 mm) showed a trend to being smaller ( p = 0.035) than those receiving human bevacizumab alone (nDRGs = 24; voxel: 144.8 ± 72.1; diameter: 1.02 ± 0.17 mm).