Excerpts

Pairwise comparisons of species communities identified marginally significant differences only between MGA and UGA (p = 0.05) and DrP and MtP (p = 0.05).

Whereas in males, almost significant differences with stress treatment [F (3,8) = 4.02, p = 0.05], with lower levels of this protein in the CI males compared with the CI-R group (Fig. 6 f).

albopictus demonstrated less sensitivity to these factors, with only the quadratic effect of temperature approaching significance ( p = 0.05).

Statistical significance and a significant trend were set at p < 0.05.

The signal was weakly significant ( p < 0.05 for all 4 LPCs) at 1000 μg/L ES and was not significant at lower concentrations.

Analyses of isolation by distance and connectivity including only the invading populations indicated a low but almost significant level of isolation by distance (r = 0.165; P = 0.05).

auratus ) as a between-subjects factor, applied on the first approaches only, revealed a marginally significant effect of the interaction Time x Geometry (F(4,64) = 2.52, p = 0.05, \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\eta }_{p}^{2}$$\end{document} η p 2 = 0.14).

A higher urine melatonin level approached significance as a predictor associated with poor sleep (OR 1.01, p = 0.05).

Duncan post-hoc analyses on visual-spatial working memory revealed that, in the Training-first Group (G1), delta 1 (M = 0.85, sem = 0.26) was significantly larger than delta 2 (M = −0.35, sem = 0.22; P < 0.01), with a very large effect (Cohen’s d = 1.21); in contrast, in the Waiting-first Group (G2), the difference between delta 1 (M = −0.19, sem = 0.30) and delta 2 (M = 0.34, sem = 0.25) was marginally significant (P = 0.05) and in the expected direction of a medium-sized improvement after training (Cohen’s d = 0.53).

Marginal significance was found in anatomical (group 1:80%, group 2:96.6%, group 3:96%, group 4:96.4%, p = 0.05) but not functional success (group 1:85%, group 2:85.7%, group 3:83.3%, group 4:88.9%, p = 0.75) at postoperative 12-month.

Pairwise significant differences were found between C and T1 as well as T1 and T2 for stride times and all asymmetries (all with large effect sizes) except mean normalized sEMG which was trending towards significance (stance: p = 0.05, swing p = 0.12) (Table 1 ).

When data were averaged across the three seasons, a marginally significant Genotype × Environment interaction was observed for live (p = 0.05) and dead (p = 0.03) fine root biomass (Fig. 2g,h ).

In non-diabetic participants (n = 8610), though the associations of the two GRSs with the four lipids were weakened, the results of causal association analyses were consistent with the analyses in the whole study sample, except for TC which was marginally significant in analysis with the Conservative GRS ( P = 0.05) (Supplemental Table 6 ).

Mildly significant ( P < 0.05) enhancing effects of marigold seed oil (61.3% calendic acid) were observed on both keratinocyte and fibroblast proliferation after 48 and 72 h at the concentrations of 0.15% and 0.10%.

The ANOVA of the regression model indicates that the model was highly significant at P < 0.05.

The statistical significance of the correlation is assessed using the p-value: a p-value < 0.01 indicates a highly significant relationship, while a p-value < 0.05 suggests a significant relationship between the independent and dependent variables 50 .

Knockdown of the two L-type Ca-channel units CACNA1F and CACNA1H revealed lower levels of reductions with effects close to significance (p = 0.05 and 0.09, respectively) (Fig. 3b ).

Despite the limited number of animals that could be tested in these experimental settings, this finding was borderline significant (Fisher exact test; p = 0.05).

The linear term coefficient of X 2 , as well as the quadric term coefficients of X 1 2 , X 2 2 , X 3 2 , had highly significant (P < 0.05) effects on cell density (transformation at base 10 log) ( Table 4 ), so Eq.1 can be simplified as: After analysis of the lipopeptides yield data, the model linear term coefficients of X 1 , X 2 and X 3 , and the cross-product coefficients of X 1 X 2 , X 1 X 3 and X 2 X 3 were not signifi

For the full dataset (N = 43), Tajima’s D and Fu’s Fs were not significant, and Fu and Li’s D was negative, but only moderately significant (0.10 > p > 0.05), suggesting population expansion.

During optogenetic stimulation of the VC, the MGB response exhibited an increasing trend (p < 0.05 for paired Student’s t test but does not pass Holm-Bonferroni correction; Supplementary Figure S7 ), suggesting a possibility that VC co-modulates auditory processing at multiple stages immediately prior to the cortex.

A p = 0.05 significance level was considered for all the analyses, although marginally significant results (p = 0.05–0.10) were also reported.

For circularity, >0.13 mm pores ( P < 0.01) exhibited a highly significant negative correlation with bulk density compared to >1.0 mm pores or 0.13–1.0 mm pores ( P < 0.05).

A plane of best fit again exhibited tilt along the minor axis (slope = −1.8 × 10 −2 units/μm for minor axis, 2.4 × 10 −3 units/μm for major axis) that did not achieve significance (p = 0.05).

Those who carried a genotype with the variant C at rs56156320 showed a trend for higher FSCN1 expression, compared with the wild-type homozygous genotypes ( p < 0.05, Fig. 1 ).