Barely Significant

Excerpts

27,100 sentences · 1 filter applied

markedly significantp < 0.051.0× alphaqualified
Both cell types showed a markedly significant decrease ( p < 0.05) in the basal OCR after a 24 h combination treatment compared with the untreated control, and not surprisingly, we also observed a significant decrease ( p < 0.05) in the ECAR (extracellular acidic ratio; an indicator of glycolysis flux) following a combination treatment in both cell types ( supporting information, Figure S9 ).
an increasing trendP < 0.051.0× alphagold
In the differential analysis between NBV-MB control group and MENK-NBV-MB group, the levels of the genes IL6ST, TNFR2, CCL24, MHC I, MHC II, CD28, FOXO-1, and SYK in the macrophages of the MENK-NBV-MB group showed an increasing trend (P < 0.05), while the level of CYCD1 genes were downregulated (P < 0.05), as shown in Fig. 7 .
highly significantP < 0.051.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Optimization of antibiotic production by response surface methodology (RSM) The results showed that the linear and quadratic effects of pH, temperature, inoculum volume, and agar concentrations were highly significant (P < 0.05), but the interactive effects of agar concentrations and inoculum volumes were insignificant (P > 0.05).
highly significantP < 0.051.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The linear term coefficient of X 2 , as well as the quadric term coefficients of X 1 2 , X 2 2 , X 3 2 , had highly significant (P < 0.05) effects on cell density (transformation at base 10 log) ( Table 4 ), so Eq.1 can be simplified as: After analysis of the lipopeptides yield data, the model linear term coefficients of X 1 , X 2 and X 3 , and the cross-product coefficients of X 1 X 2 , X 1 X 3 and X 2 X 3 were not signifi
highly significantp > 0.051.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Kaplan and Meier's method used to estimate overall and Progression-free survival and log-rank test compared survival curves All statistical comparisons were two-tailed with a significance level of p-value ≤ 0.05 indicates significant, p < 0.001 indicates a highly significant difference while p > 0.05 indicates a non-significant difference.
a decreasing trendp < 0.051.0× alphagold
In the diabetic control group, the blood glucose levels had been also rising since the injection of the STZ by the end of the sixth week; but in the diabetic trained group, a decreasing trend was observed which revealed a significant reduction started at the beginning of the fourth week of the study (p < 0.05).
marginally significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
auratus ) as a between-subjects factor, applied on the first approaches only, revealed a marginally significant effect of the interaction Time x Geometry (F(4,64) = 2.52, p = 0.05, \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\eta }_{p}^{2}$$\end{document} η p 2 = 0.14).