Barely Significant

Excerpts

27,100 sentences · 1 filter applied

marginal significanceP = 0.05051.0× alphagold
Specifically, BUSTED detected one positively selected cone-expressed gene, CNGB3 , along the ancestral Euarchontoglires branch, which was not detected by PAML, and BUSTED also detected one cone-expressed gene, SWS1 , at close to marginal significance ( P = 0.0505), which was found to be under positive selection by PAML.
While sex was included as an independent term in the best model (Table 1 ), the correlation between the sex of the badger and the frequency with which they made ETEs did not quite reach significance (P = 0.0506, Table 2 ) across the whole year, although the trend was towards males making, on average, more frequent ETEs throughout the year (Fig. 4 – mean values).
nearly significantp = 0.05061.0× alphagold
The results (Table 4 ) show that all of these parameters, when combined in a multiple regression model, were significantly different between cases and controls, except testosterone levels, which were nearly significant with a p -value slightly above 0.05 ( p = 0.0506), and smoking status, which was not significant.
nearly reached significanceP = 0.05061.0× alpha
There was an increase in HIF-1α mRNA expression that nearly reached significance in the RS group ( P = 0.0506), and the HIF-1α target gene, VEGFa, and VEGFR2 mRNA had significantly higher expression levels in the RS group compared to the control group (Fig. 5A–C ).
In line with Hypothesis 1 (H1), we found correlations between C max (the maximal cross-correlation of cortical and autonomic signals), T max (the individual delay) and V-derived fluctuation periods (p = 0.003) whereas the correlation between either C max or T max and HR-derived periods just failed to reach significance (C max : p = 0.051, T max : p = 0.069).
marginally significantp = 0.0511.0× alphagold
Results Experiment 1: AUT items as word only or word + image As regards idea fluency, we found a marginally significant effect of condition in the dual procedure (within-subject comparison), with higher number of ideas generated for word + image than word only items ( p = 0.051, η p 2 = 0.144, large effect size ; Supplementary Table 1 , Fig. 1 ).