did not quite reach significancep = 0.052
Cu also trended higher in the deep samples but did not quite reach significance ( p = 0.052).
Cu also trended higher in the deep samples but did not quite reach significance ( p = 0.052).
An multinomial logistic regression analysis indicated that for overall developmental levels, being at the normal level was influenced by increased family income and decreased parental age (borderline significance at p = 0.052).
2A ), but this effect appeared weaker than the shift in perception for /aba/ sounds, as suggested by a marginally significant interaction (F(1, 26) = 4,15, p = 0.052) between current stimulus (auditory /aba/, /ada/) and previous stimulus (fused McGurk stimulus, all other stimuli).
There was a borderline significant positive correlation (r = 0.242, P = 0.052, post-hoc power = 0.499) between the average RNFL thickness and the smaller/larger HF N95 amplitude ratio.
The water score was only marginally significant (p = 0.052).
Furthermore, BAT volume was lower in South Asians as compared to white Caucasians (185 mL vs 303 mL), which was borderline significant (p = 0.052) while the difference was significant in the original study 25 due to larger sample size.
A comparison of geometrically correct choices between the real-world and VR environments was marginally significant (Z = 1.92, p = 0.052).
Concerning the area of entrapment, athletic identity was negatively associated with the burnout dimensions sport devaluation and reduced sense of accomplishment and positively with the burnout dimension physical/ emotional exhaustion, even though it just failed to reach significance for this specific dimension ( p = 0.052).
The variation observed in the percentage of bees responding to sucrose solutions was marginally non-significant (GLMM, treatment: χ 2 = 9.41, df: 4, P = 0.052; sucrose concentration: χ 2 = 9.38, df: 4, P = 0.052).
The reduced learning acquisition following EMF exposure of bees from hive 2, however, approached significance (Bonferroni: P = 0.052).
The distal-to-proximal approach showed a higher success rate (96.7%) compared to the proximal-to-distal approach (76.7%), with a near-significant difference ( p = 0.052).
For the lateral compartment, a numerical trend for smaller loss of cartilage volume ( p = 0.052) was found in the post-treatment period in the IACI group.
Patients with higher BAF segment counts had nearly significant better OS (HR 0.49 (95% CI 0.29–0.9), >359 vs ≤359, p = 0.052).
Differently, the Lows had a larger illusion index in normal waking (2.58 ± 0.46) compared to hypnosis ( p = 0.003, d = 1.12, CI [1.08 4.4]); whereas in the Highs the comparison between the illusion index in normal waking (1.81 ± 0.58) and in hypnosis showed only a trend toward significance ( p = 0.052, d = −0.64, CI [−4.98 0.03]) (Fig. 4B ).
There was only a marginally significant effect on the AUC for glucose between the HFC and LFC (t 12 = 2.160 p = 0.052; Fig. 2H ).
However, in the FR32 schedule the number of key presses was lower for the high PS group compared to the low PS group close to being statistically significant ( U = 114, Z = −1.94, p = 0.052) (see Fig. 2 ).
By April, measurements still showed a strong trend towards being higher in invaded plots (F 1,3 = 9.83, P = 0.052), although the difference was reduced by May (Fig. 4 ).
In addition, loading of material was included due to its borderline significance (P = 0.052).
However, a marginally significant difference was found between treatments (F (1,28) = 4.11, p = 0.052), and a significant one within treatments (F (1,28) = 7.73, p = 0.01).
Even more importantly, a marginally significant interaction between type of IMS stroking and percentage of self-other morphing (Identity) was observed (F 4,72 = 2.475, η 2 = 0.121, p = 0.052) (Fig. 2A ).
This effect was absent in the OFA (F (1,25) = 2.4, p = 0.13), with a marginally significant interaction (F (1,24) = 4.2, p = 0.052) between region (FFA vs.
Both the final Watered and final Control samples in the near-infrared exhibit higher reflectance values than the early Control and early Watered, and while it is only statistically significant for the Watered samples ( Table 2 ), the Control samples showed P values near significance (p = 0.052).
The common pathways in the experimental SR study and the DILGOM sample were: Cholesterol transport, Sterol transport (both P = 0.048), Cholesterol homeostasis and Sterol homeostasis (both with a borderline significance of P = 0.052) ( Table 1 ).
Additionally, females housed with castrated males showed a trend (P = 0.052) for higher FCM than females housed with other females, although again, this effect did not reach conventional statistical significance ( Fig. 2 ).
Comparisons between ROC curves for the modified scores compared with their original values are summarised in Table 3 , and show a significant difference for the HEMORR 2 HAGES (p = 0.028) score with borderline significance for the modified ATRIA score (p = 0.052).