The amount of dextran entering the animal was very small even when the dextran was added before cutting and the average fluorescence value was not significantly higher than in other groups; no significant difference was apparent by ANOVA (F = 3.236; p = 0.05219; Fig. 7 e).
Excerpts
The near-significant bacteriology × phase interaction ( p = 0.0524) suggests dynamic responses, but low sensitivity in late lactation limits diagnostic utility, possibly as a result of non-IMI related inflammatory responses such as increased blood/milk barrier permeability due to tissue remodeling.
At the outpatient level, consumption exhibited an immediate and marginally significant increase following 2020 ( p = 0.05244), interrupting an otherwise consistent downward trend.
showed a trendp = 0.0525
2 B), the Navax group showed a trend toward a 16% reduction in the rates of patients having this symptom at day 3 compared to day 0, approaching statistical significance ( p = 0.0525), while the Control group showed a smaller, non-significant 10% reduction ( p = 0.273).
At day 0, DHF patients tended to associate with higher median antibody titers (median: 4.522, IQR: 1–160.1) compared with DF patients (median: 0, IQR: 1–19.32), although the difference was only marginally significant (p = 0.0525) (Fig. 3 d).
Statistical analysis suggests this relationship to be marginally significant ( p -value = 0.05258; ρ = 0.5968; Spearman’s Rank correlation coefficient = 88.701), suggesting possible seasonal variability in 25(OH)D 3 .
Overall differences in shear stress in all cross-sections were on the borderline of significance according to the Mann–Whitney test ( p = 0.0527).
For DNMT1 , an ANOVA revealed a marginally significant main effect of infant condition ( F (1,61) = 3.903, p = 0.0527, Cohen’s d = 0.753), however, post-hoc analyses failed to meet significance (nurturing care versus maltreatment vehicle groups, p = 0.0852).
In addition, compound 3 was found to give a p -value approaching significance ( p = 0.0528) with p -cresol production decreased by 29.1 ± 16.3% (Fig. 3 ).
of borderline significancep = 0.0528
We did not identify any predictor for significant muscle wasting, however, age was of borderline significance (p = 0.0528).
marginally non-significantp = 0.053
In the gills there was also a marginally non-significant increase between 19 °C and 28 °C ( p = 0.053, Fig. 4 d).
The HCM group showed a marginal significance of an increased risk of PCI compared to the non-HCM group (HR [95% CI] 1.24 [1.00–1.55], p = 0.053) (Table S5 ).
The mean orientation error for the SR case (1.7 ± 1.5 deg) was significantly lower than the Clin (8.0 ± 5.8 deg; p = 0.019) and approaching significance for RS (3.8 ± 2.2 deg; p = 0.053) case.
A nearly significant trend for differential cueing benefits across participants with versus without reliable cue discrimination was found ( t (21) = 2.05, p = 0.053, Cohen’s d = 0.95).
One variable showed marginal significance of association with NL: visits to diabetes clinic ( p = 0.053).
Furthermore, the median ARS duration for late recurrence was 10 months, while the median ARS duration for early recurrence was six months, and the difference was marginally significant ( P = 0.053).
The main effect of preference was not significant, χ 2 (1) = 0.720, p = 0.396, while the interaction of preference and effort level was close to being significant, χ 2 (1) = 3.738, p = 0.053, with the slope of the effort predictor however being higher for effort versus reward preferences, t = 1.970, p = 0.049 (see also Fig. 5 a).
a trend toward significancep = .053
For sleep quality, there was a trend toward significance for day, F (4.27, 123.7) = 2.36, p = .053, η2 = 0.04.
A main effect was found for MMSE score and the interaction with twin status was only marginally significant (GLM interaction term zygosity status × MMSE score: z = 1.933 p < 0.053).
The difference between CST and UST rats in corticosterone levels immediately after the 8 th session was marginally significant (p = 0.053).
For NfL, there was a statistical trend towards a higher concentration in boxers compared to patients with SCD (δ = 0.492 [CI = 0.003, 0.791], p = .053).
The covariation between the PLS1 COMT profile and the PLS1 lFFA-MRI profile was marginally significant (permutation test, p = 0.053; upper panel of Supplementary Fig.
borderline significanceP = 0.053
After adjusting for age, sex, and baseline CFT in a multiple regression analysis, the presence of PED, disrupted ELM and EZ, and greater baseline CFT were still significantly associated with baseline visual acuity ( P = 0.022, 0.003, <0.001, 0.024, respectively), while the presence of IRC showed a similar trend but with borderline significance ( P = 0.053).
The effect of adaptation type was marginally significant (F(3,9) = 3.76, p = 0.053).
In the younger patient group (<55 years), the first (≤737.3) and second tertile (737.4–966.3) of frontal skull HU value groups also showed a tendency for increased ventriculomegaly development, although this did not quite reach statistical significance (p = 0.053) (Fig. 3C ).