Barely Significant

Excerpts

27,100 sentences · 1 filter applied

only marginally significantP = 0.0701.4× alphagold
With respect to epidemiological characteristics with binomial values, Fusobacterium was associated with alcohol consumption and KRAS mutation ( P = 0.088 and P = 0.094), and Parvimonas was associated with tumor location and KRAS mutation, although the difference was only marginally significant ( P = 0.070, Table 4 ).
bordered on significancep = 0.071.4× alpha
The proportion of cases effected by chorioamnionitis was slightly higher in the control group compared to PEC, although not statistically significant ( p =0.07) Chorioamnionitis was the only factor that bordered on significance p = 0.07 between the preterm PEC and preterm control groups (Table S6) and was higher in the control group than the PEC group ( Supplementary Table S6 ) .
not strictly significantp = 0.071.4× alphagold
The results showed a clear trend (even if not strictly significant p = 0.07) in the number of selected features over the frontal areas, since they were significantly higher for the ATCO Students (Fig. 13 ) than for the ATCO Experts (Fig. 12 ), while no difference were found among the selected parietal features (p = 0.63).
close to significancep = 0.071.4× alpha
Helmert contrasts showed that N2pc increased with the number of object parts: N2pc amplitude was smaller for 1-part stimuli compared to higher numerosities (F(1,13) = 30.57, p = 0.0001, p η 2 = 0.70), for 2-parts objects compared to higher numerosities (F(1,13) = 18.48, p = 0.001, p η 2 = 0.59), and close to significance when comparing the N2pc amplitude for 3-parts objects to the mean N2pc amplitude for 4- and 5-parts stimuli (F(1,13) = 3.87, p = 0.07, p η 2 = 0.23).
marginally significantP = 0.071.4× alphagold
2 A) with no significant main effect of session [F(4, 120) = 0.22, P = 0.93, η 2 = 0.0002 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0, 0.0003)] and a significant interaction between session and contingency [F(4, 120) = 3.35, P = 0.01, η 2 = 0.004 (95% CI 0.0008, 0.01)], whereas the interaction between session and face perception was marginally significant [F(4, 120) = 2.20, P = 0.07, η 2 = 0.004 (95% CI 0.0003, 0.003)].
a significant trendp = 0.0701.4× alphagold
2 , the Useless risk group (Cluster 2) showed significantly lower loss aversion in MGT, and higher scores in stimulant risk assessed with S&IRQ, than Risk-avoidant (Cluster 1) and Useful risk (Cluster 3) groups; additionally, the Useless risk group also scored significantly lower than the Useful risk group on the IGT and showed a significant trend ( p = 0.070) towards less consistency in their decisions as assessed by the MGT than the latter group (Table 4 ).
marginally significantP = 0.071.4× alphagold
Results Migration distance and recruitment of new neurons When exploring links between migration distance and new neuronal recruitment in turtle doves we found marginally significant increase in recruitment into the NCL for birds flying longer distances (P = 0.07; ρ = 0.53; N = 12; Fig. 1 ), but not in the HC (P = 0.96; ρ = −0.01; N = 11).