Laccaria laccata had a significant correlation ( p < 0.05) with Co, and marginally significant correlations ( p < 0.10) with As and Mn, and Volvopluteus gloiocephalus with Fe.
Excerpts
a trend toward significanceP < 0.10
Differences were declared significant at P < 0.05 and a trend toward significance at 0.05 ≤ P < 0.10.
These robustness analyses (Table 2 ) reveal consistent findings with those presented in Table 1 for H2, but we do find evidence consistent with H1 (a marginally significant point estimate of 0.331, p < 0.1 for value aligned treatments, i.e., an increase in donations of 0.3 of a token).
Moreover, while PM data is not significant, the distribution of DMs is slightly significant according to the χ 2 test ( p < 0.1).
There were marginally significant (0.05 < P < 0.1) differences in age, sex, race, and serum levels of CRP between the two groups.
showed a trendp = 0.10
Nur77-KO mice showed a trend towards enhanced cardiac function (p = 0.10 ejection fraction, p = 0.08 fractional shortening) assessed by echocardiography ( Supplementary Fig.
When combination of enhancement and IPH was used for culprit plaque classification, DL-VWI showed higher AUROC (0.91; sensitivity 100%, specificity 81.6%) in diagnosing culprit plaques than Conv-VWI (0.84; sensitivity 88.2%, specificity 79.6%), with marginal significance ( P = 0.10).
tendency towards significancep < 0.10
With respect to the changes of miRNAs we also report on results with a tendency towards significance, i.e. p < 0.10.
The repeated-measures ANOVA also yielded a significant interaction between congruency and category ( F (2, 38) = 4.17, p < 0.05 ) and a marginally significant interaction between congruency, category, and distance ( F (2, 38) = 2.77, p < 0.10 ).
For the IL1RL1 gene, an additional marker (rs1041973) showed borderline significant association (p-value = 0.100).
did not quite reach significancep = 0.10
As with unilateral AION, the rod-weighted logI 50 for both affected eyes was higher compared to control eyes but the difference did not quite reach significance (median logI 50 for better eyes = −2.40 log cd/m2, for worse eyes = −2.31 log cd/m2 compared to −2.60 log cd/m2 for control eyes, p = 0.10).
Two other SNPs, both in MAP3K5 , reached borderline significance (P < 0.1) in the replication population with similar effects as the discovery population: rs9389421 (P = 0.063) and rs13195420 (P = 0.055).
Where initial results were, at least, marginally statistically significant ( p < 0.1), we applied a series of eliminations of rows and columns of the contingency tables, whilst re-running the significance test, to identify the levels of the two variables with which the pattern was associated.
However, the difference was only marginally significant ( P < 0.1).
For measures of urge-tic association, individual logistic and linear regression coefficients did not differ between age groups (two-sided test: p > 0.4, one-sided tests: p > 0.2) while a marginally significant difference was found for correlation coefficients (t(38.23) = − 1.69, two-sided test: p = 0.10, one-sided test “adults > children”: p = 0.05), indicating weaker urge-tic associations in children and adolescents compared to adults (Fig. 5 ).
showed a trendP ≤ 0.1
control groups to the EPM results reveal that a decreased in relative abundance of Bacteroides uniformis and Coprococcus eutactus in AgNC-treated individuals showed a trend for a negative correlation with time spent in the center of the maze (P ≤ 0.1, Fig. 13 ).
Contrasts were considered significant when P ≤ 0.05 and marginally significant when 0.05 < P ≤ 0.10.
The numbers of biochemicals that achieved statistical significance ( p ≤ 0.05) between infected compared to uninfected treatment groups was 75 (34 higher and 41 lower) in the tissue (Supplemental Table S11 ) and 111 (52 higher and 59 lower) in the contents (Supplemental Table S12 ), as well as those approaching significance (0.05 < p < 0.10) with 31 in tissue (15 higher and 16 lower) and 35 in the contents (24 higher and 11 lower).
Only three bivariate linear models yielded near-significant ( p < 0.10) relationships with number of trees, and these models still yielded significance with these predictors: mean distance to nearest town ( p = 0.006; R 2 = 0.523), distance to nearest trail ( p = 0.014; R 2 = 0.476), and mean wind speed ( p = 0.006; R 2 = 0.517).
One study using data from four cross-sectional and longitudinal surveys from 25 European countries, Israel and the United States found that depressive symptoms were linked to reduced voting in three of the four datasets and were of near significance in the fourth (p < 0.10) 13 .
The insula activity in the nonsuicidal depressed patients was at an intermediate level between the suicide attempters and healthy controls, with a marginal significance level when directly compared to each group (p < 0.1, post hoc Tukey’s test).
Genes involved in starch and sucrose metabolism and amino sugar and nucleotide metabolism were affected by the factor group: the former had a higher relative abundance in CON and MUL than MUH ( p < 0.01), whereas the latter showed an increasing trend in MUL compared to MUH ( p < 0.1).
borderline significanceP ≤ 0.1
When building a logistic regression model, the variables with borderline significance between the sexes at baseline (P ≤ 0.1: age, hypertension, NIHSS of 0 at baseline) were independent risk factors for poor functional outcome (P = 0.001) but none of them were independent risk factors for poor social outcome.
Eye muscle area did not show significant correlations with any metabolite except for a negative trend with mannose, leucine and citrate (P ≤ 0.10; Fig. 3 ).
For men, the two-way interaction term (depressive symptoms × brokerage) predicting adjusted left hippocampal volume was marginally significant ( p = 0.10).