Barely Significant

Excerpts

27,100 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantqualifiedgold
The fixed effect of brain score (shared across narratives) is highly significant: \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\beta =\,0.04, p<10^{-29}$$\end{document} β = 0.04 , p < 10 - 29 , cf.
Test results were considered as significant when \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\text {p}\,<\,0.05$$\end{document} p < 0.05 and as marginally significant (trend of significance) when \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\text {p}\,<\,0.1$$\end{document} p < 0.1 .
Additionally, as in the main analysis, the changes between the pre- and post-task rest similarity with the task patterns resulted from decreased similarity of the post-task rest to the Grip (t(14) = 3.28, p = 0.006, significant after correction) and to the Extend (t(14) = 2.57, p = 0.022, approaching significance) conditions relative to the pre-task rest.
Table S5 shows that the interaction between age and PM 2.5 was not significant (linear interaction P -value = 0.08 and non-linear interaction P -value = 0.06), while Table S6 shows the interaction between age and PM 10 had a marginally significant effect on serum 25OHD levels (linear P -value for interaction = 0.045 and non-linear P -value for interaction = 0.04).
highly significantqualifiedgold
Binomial logistic regression analysis of such statistically significant variables indicated that with a high level of each anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody, only three factors, namely, chronic respiratory diseases (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06–3.52; p = 0.0308), smoking history (aOR, 3.18; 95% CI, 1.53–6.63; p = 0.0020), and COVID-19 history (aOR, 22.7; 95% CI, 4.14–124; p = 0.0003; Table 1 ), were highly significant risk factors for infectious seropositivity.