Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp -value < 2.2 × 10 -160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
All fitted models were highly significant ( F 5,122 = 26.1, p -value < 2.2 × 10 -16 with ‖ Δ ^ ̄ − Δ ‖ as response; F 5,122 = 47.7, p -value < 2.2 × 10 -16 with λ ^ ̄ as response; and F 5,122 = 12.1, p -value = 1.6 × 10 -9 with | ε ^ g e n − ε ̃ g e n | ̄ as response); residual plots showed no large deviations from the assumptions of normality of error distribution (an asymptotic normal distribution of the response variables is warranted by the central limit theorem), homoscedasticity, and independent errors (data not shown).
highly significantp-value < 2.2e-160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
0.00276, Fisher's exact test p-value = 1.34e-05), there is a highly significant excess of sites supporting the species topology (0.00229 vs. 0.00210, Fisher's exact test p-value < 2.2e-16) and deficit of sites in these regions supporting ILS topologies (0.00042 vs. 0.00066, Fisher's exact test p-value < 2.2e-16, Fig 2B and 2C ), which suggests that the observed reduction of ILS is not the result of a lower mutation rate.
highly significantp < 2.2 × 10 −160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
One notes highly significant terms for time (β-est. = 0.21, (95%C.I. 0.17, 0.25), p < 2.2 × 10 −16 ), monthly cannabis use (β-est. = 2.97, (1.91, 4.03), p = 8.2 × 10 −8 ), cannabis use quintiles (β-est. = 3.86, (2.45, 5.27), p = 1.2 × 10 −7 ), dichotomized cannabis use quintiles (β-est. = 3.54, (2.19, 4.89), p = 4.4 × 10 −7 ) and time: quintile interactions. 3.4.
highly significantp < 2.2 × 10 −160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Samples tended to cluster according to batch of origin, indicating systematic rather than random variation with highly significant differences in LCR-associated z-scores across batches (Kruskal–Wallis p < 2.2 × 10 −16 ) and multiple significant pairwise contrasts identified by Wilcoxon tests.
highly significantP < 2.2e-160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
andersonii (tested via independent samples Wilcoxon rank-sum test), while its F is value was also significantly lower ( P < 0.05).Furthermore, verification of Rarefied Allelic Richness (Ar) via the Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test revealed a highly significant difference between the two species (chi-squared = 1770.3, df = 1, P < 2.2e-16), confirming that the genetic diversity of B. andersonii is robustly higher than that of B. tianguii even after standardizing sample sizes ( Figure 3 ). 3.3.
highly significantp < 2.2 × 10 −160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Indeed, we observed a moderate, though highly significant correlation between CDS length and fold change (FC) in translation (r 2 = 0.26; p < 2.2 × 10 −16 ), which produces a downregulatory effect for genes with long CDSs and, vice versa, an upregulatory effect for genes with short CDSs (Fig. 2 C).