Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,635 sentences

highly significantP < 2.22e-160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Our second question: Did adaptation to the media or the presence of SA alter phage resistance? Our analysis revealed highly significant effects of both Treatment ( F = 132.73, df = 3, P < 2.22e-16) and Condition ( F = 41.83, df = 4, P < 2.22e-16) on the area under the growth curve, as well as significant Treatment × Condition interaction ( F = 37.66, df = 12, P < 2.22e-16).
highly significantp < 2.22e-160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Notably, the NecropImmScore strongly correlated with immunophenotype score (IPS), with high-score tumors exhibiting significantly higher IPS across all combinations of CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1 status (all p -values highly significant, e.g., p < 2.22e-16, F i g. 6 F–I), indicating enhanced potential response to immune checkpoint blockade.
highly significantp < 2.22e − 160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Not only were the differences highly significant between each cell type (Mann Whitney Wilcoxon test, p < 2.22e − 16), but also the spatial order agreed with stereotypical tissue organization such that suprabasal cells were furthest away from smooth muscle cells, followed by basal cells and fibroblasts (Fig. 2 f).
highly significantp -value = 2.22 × 10 −160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In this study, highly significant Pearson’s correlations ( p -value = 2.22 × 10 −16 ) among the mRNA expression of these genes were obtained (r ELOVL5-ELOVL6 = 0.90; r ELOVL5-SCD = 0.84; r ELOVL6-SCD = 0.86), supporting the involvement of common elements regulating their mRNA expression.
highly significantp < 2.22 x 10 −160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
For log propodus height, there was no significant difference in the angle of slope between males and females (p = 0.078), but there was a highly significant difference in slope elevation when slope angles were assumed to be equal (p < 2.22 x 10 −16 ) ( Table 2 ), with males having broader log propodus heights than females throughout the size distribution of log carapace lengths ( Fig 5 ).
highly significantp = 3 × 10 −160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
This approach overcomes a problematic relationship we observed within the data: there was a highly significant correlation between ovary mass and body mass among queenless workers from all four colonies (Pearson correlation, R = 0.48, p = 3 × 10 −16 ; figure 3 a ).