Excerpts

Although matched on age (± 2 years), the BED group was approximately 9 months older than the NC group and 13 months older than the PC group, both differences being statistically significant or marginally significant using an adjusted α of 1% ( Table 1 ; P = 0.002 or 0.025).

Despite the small number of patients, the difference between first and last BFRCS score was highly significant [ t (6) = 5.2, p = 0.002, n = 7, exclusion of the patient with Kanner scale], indicating that catatonia was more severe at the beginning [16.4 (SD 4.1)] than at the end of the course of tDCS [8.9 (SD 6.5)].

However, APD activity had a highly significant ( p = 0.002, adj.

A strong trend (before and after adjusting for multiple testing: p = 0.002 and p = 0.059) was observed for SUVmax within non-PCa-PET after applying the LBP filter.

Results We found a highly significant effect of condition (i.e., video category) on the relative HR change from pre-baseline to video presentation ( X 2 = 9.91, df = 2, p = 0.002), i.e., heart rate changed differently depending on the video category.

Simple regression analyses showed that bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP), TRACP-5b and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) at baseline may be significant predictors of 6-month BMD changes in both the lumbar spine (BAP: β = 0.558, p = 0.002; TRACP-5b: β = 0.611, p = 0.0005; ALP: β = 0.484, p = 0.009) and total hip (BAP: β = 0.546, p = 0.002; TRACP-5b: β = 0.482, p = 0.009; ALP: β = 0.462, p = 0.013) (Table 2 ).

However, there was a highly significant difference in mean incidence, between the two time periods when comparing mean incidence across years ( p = 0.002), using independent-sample t-test.

However, the differences were highly significant between the CG (control group) and the studied groups (BCT+ALND, BCT+SLNB) for the following parameters: BETA angle of thoracolumbar spine inclination ( p = 0.002), GAMMA angle of thoracic spine inclination ( p = 0.0044), TKA (thoracic kyphosis angle) ( p < 0.0001) and shoulder level inclination ( p = 0.0004).

>30 weeks post-infection from these 8 RM were highly significant (p = 0.002 for all samples, p = 0.0006 for BM by two-sided Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests).

We first confirm the highly significant difference in DNA methylation between HC and RA in purified CD4+ T-cells ( Figure 1 E, data for the TNF assay, HC (n = 5) and RA (n = 6), p = 0.002).

Mentalizing categories The effect of mentalizing category was highly significant, F (2, 350) = 6.54, p = 0.002.

This value, however, showed a highly significant difference for spiders (p = 0.002).

By marked contrast, in this study, calf-level MRI-quantified fat fraction showed large responsiveness (SRM=0·83) with a highly significant (p=0·002) increase in fat fraction at 12 months.

However, there was a highly significant statistical difference in the type of plasma expander used between them ( P = 0.002).

The mean duration of motor block was more in Group III (156.66 ± 5.62), followed by Group II (139.16 ± 4.16) and Group I (124.50 ± 8.34), which was statistically highly significant ( P = 0.002).

A significant trend was seen for reason for use with younger athletes using cannabis more for recreational ( p = 0.002) and both THC and CBD for medical and recreational reasons (p = 0.009), while older athletes used cannabis for medical purposes (p < 0.001).

A decreasing trend across quarters was also observed for behind-the-neck treatments on pets (p = 0.002).

Meta-analysis In the meta-analysis performed, when only the internal gap [ Figure 2 ] was evaluated, there was a statistically significant difference with a favorable trend in the press technique (DM = 70.51, 95% CI: 25.45–115.58, P = 0.002).

Importantly, we discovered a trend for a negative association between the level of histological MF and serum CITP:MMP1 ratios in the cohort as a whole ( r = −0.18; p = 0.08), which could predominantly be attributed to the highly significant association in the classical LF‐LG AS group ( r = −0.62; p = 0.002) (Figure 1C,D ).

b* differences were however slightly significant for the visual examination from day 28 onward (p = 0.002), but a change in L* vales was only detected as significant after 39 days (p = 0.015). ΔE values varied from 0.027 to 0.163 for the samples stored in the dark (days 7 to 46) and from 0.035 to 3.558 (days 7 to 46) when exposed to light.

Results The preoperative patient’s characteristics (risk factors) of both groups were comparable in both groups in all variables, except the following: The patients treated with InteguSeal ® showed a highly significant rate of lower ejection fraction (p=0.002), congestive heart failure (p=0.001) and acute myocardial infarction (p=0.008) compared with the control group.

These differences were highly significant (p = 0.002 -CA, p < 0.001 - CO).

cochlear implant hearing aid electroencephalography auditory evoked potentials source localization speech recognition bimodal benefit auditory rehabilitation Post-implantation, paired t tests ( t values) and Wilcoxon tests in case of non-normality ( z values) showed significant improvements of speech recognition with the CI ear between T3 and T4 for the OlSa S0 ( z = 3.296, ∗∗ p < 0.001), S0N0 ( t = 3.300, ∗∗ p < 0.001), and S0NHA ( z = 2.638, ∗ p < 0.009) conditions when applying the Bonferroni-corrected significance limen for significant ∗ ( p < 0.01) and highly significant ∗∗ ( p < 0.002) differences ( Figure 1 ).

In a later analysis of a smaller ( n = 356) subsection of the cohort with more complete data (18% missing LA Z-scores), the hazard ratio was lower, 1.03, and not statistically significant (whereas in contrast maximal wall thickness Z-scores hazard ratio 1.07 remained highly significant, p = 0.002).

The probability of the incubation period having a MD of greater than 4 m was 71.64% (48/67), which was much higher than that of the brooding period (48.08%, 25/52) (Figure 4 .), and the values showed a highly significant difference (Chi‐squared test, χ 2 1 = 7.496, p = .002).